Employment Tribunal decisions and outcome patterns in the Care Work sector from the last 12 months.
Final Care Work decisions with at least one determined claim.
Proportion of cases won or split/upheld in our database.
Cases lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
Showing 12 cases from the last 2 months.
Browse the latest published decisions for employers represented in this sector sample.
Both complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract were dismissed after a full hearing.
Reference: 6015364/2026
The claimant succeeded in her claim for a redundancy payment after the respondent failed to present a valid response, resulting in a default judgment awarding £2,211.30.
Reference: 6001065/2026
All claims were dismissed, either as not well-founded or on withdrawal.
Reference: 2301796/2024
The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was struck out for lack of qualifying service, and the entire claim was subsequently struck out for failure to comply with a Tribunal order and lack of active pursuit.
Reference: 6016333/2025
The claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with a tribunal order to exchange witness statements and did not respond to a warning letter, making a fair trial impossible.
Reference: 6012623/2025
All claims were dismissed: unfair dismissal withdrawn, and the remaining Equality Act claims were dismissed as out of time as it was not just and equitable to extend time.
Reference: 6017618/2025
All claims were dismissed on jurisdictional grounds: unfair dismissal for lack of qualifying service, and wages/breach of contract for being out of time.
Reference: 2600820/2025
The claimant succeeded on claims of discrimination arising from disability and harassment but failed on whistleblowing, automatic unfair dismissal, direct discrimination, and victimisation.
Reference: 1401120/2025
The claim for automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A ERA was dismissed because the claimant did not make a protected disclosure (no reasonable belief in public interest) and in any event the disclosure was not the reason for dismissal.
Reference: 6022957/2025
The claimant won because the tribunal found she was dismissed by reason of her pregnancy, making the dismissal unfair and an act of maternity and pregnancy discrimination.
Reference: 6012693/2025
Both claims were struck out because, even taken at their highest, the evidence—particularly the clear CCTV footage—showed a gross misconduct dismissal with no reasonable prospect of establishing unfair dismissal or race discrimination.
Reference: 6005865/2025
The claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages failed and was dismissed.
Reference: 1600665/2026