Sector Report
Construction Tribunal Data Analysis
Latest legal precedents and outcome patterns in the Construction sector based on our 12-month database analysis.
106Cases Analysed (Last 12 Months)
Historical Construction decisions from our database catalog.
60%Success Factor
Proportion of claims won or split/upheld in our database.
40%Dismissal Rate
Claims lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
↑ Strongest IndicatorUnfair Dismissal (67% Success)
↓ Weakest IndicatorUnfair dismissal (21% Success)
Search by Claim Type
Showing 8 cases from the last 2 months.
6019798/2024 • 8 Apr 2026
won
The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair, the employer breached the contract by not giving proper notice and unlawfully deducted wages, entitling the claimant to multiple awards.
Legal Issues (4)
- Unfair dismissal
- breach of contract (failure to give notice)
- unlawful deduction of wages
- holiday pay claim under Working Time Regulations.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2312570/2024 • 23 Mar 2026
split
The Tribunal upheld the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim but dismissed the holiday pay, arrears of pay and redundancy claims.
Legal Issues (5)
- Constructive unfair dismissal
- failure to provide written statement of employment particulars (section 38 Employment Act 2002)
- holiday pay entitlement
- arrears of pay
- redundancy entitlement.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
1401584/2024 • 20 Mar 2026
won
The tribunal found the claimant’s constructive unfair dismissal claim well‑founded and awarded the agreed sums for holiday pay, unauthorised deductions and unpaid wages, together with compensation for unfair and wrongful dismissal.
Legal Issues (6)
- Constructive unfair dismissal
- wrongful dismissal (notice entitlement)
- holiday pay entitlement
- unauthorised deductions from wages
- breach of written particulars
- protected disclosure (out of time).
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2305347/2021 • 20 Mar 2026
struck_out
The Tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant had not actively pursued it for over three years and failed to respond to the Tribunal’s warning.
Legal Issues (4)
- Breach of TUPE regulation 13
- unfair dismissal
- claim struck out under Rule 38 for failure to actively pursue the claim
- and stay of proceedings against a liquidated company.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
1302210/2025 • 19 Mar 2026
lost
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not comply with tribunal directions.
Legal Issues (1)
- Failure to comply with Tribunal orders; non‑attendance at hearing; dismissal of claim under rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6003038/2025 • 13 Mar 2026
struck_out
The claimant did not comply with tribunal directions or demonstrate active pursuit of the claim, so the Tribunal exercised its discretion to strike out the claim.
Legal Issues (2)
- Failure to actively pursue the claim and non‑compliance with Tribunal orders
- resulting in a strike‑out under Rule 38(1)(d).
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2228523/2024 • 13 Mar 2026
won
All four ISG companies failed to comply with the statutory consultation duties, so the claimants’ protective award claims under s189 succeeded.
Legal Issues (1)
- Whether the respondents complied with the statutory collective consultation obligations (TULRCA 1992 s188); failure to do so giving rise to a protective award under s189.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
8001605/2025 • 11 Mar 2026
lost
The Tribunal concluded the claim was out of time and that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have lodged it within the statutory period, so the claim was dismissed.
Legal Issues (3)
- Whether the claim was filed within the three‑month limitation period
- the effect of early conciliation under sections 207B(3) and 207B(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- and whether it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have lodged the claim on time (Dedman principle).
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
Data sources
Decisions are sourced from official GOV.UK Employment Tribunal publications.
Important: Summaries and statistics are automated. Always verify against the original decision documents.