WorkDisputes Logo
Sector Report

Finance Tribunal Data Analysis

Latest legal precedents and outcome patterns in the Finance sector based on our 12-month database analysis.

95Cases Analysed (Last 12 Months)

Historical Finance decisions from our database catalog.

31%Success Factor

Proportion of claims won or split/upheld in our database.

69%Dismissal Rate

Claims lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.

↑ Strongest IndicatorUnfair dismissal (50% Success)
↓ Weakest IndicatorUnfair Dismissal (18% Success)

Showing 5 cases from the last 2 months.

6002776/20253 Jun 2026
other

The Tribunal only resolved a preliminary issue by finding the claimant disabled; no substantive claim was adjudicated.

Legal Issues (1)
  • Determination of disability status under the Equality Act 2010; assessment of mental impairment (anxiety and social anxiety) as a disability.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6012249/202426 May 2026
lost

The tribunal found that the claimant's protected disclosures were not the principal reason for dismissal; genuine concerns about the claimant's work and conduct were the effective cause.

Legal Issues (1)
  • Interim relief for automatic unfair dismissal (s.129 ERA 1996); protected disclosure definition (s.43B ERA); 'pretty good chance' test; causation and principal reason for dismissal; detriment for protected disclosures.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6012327/202614 May 2026
lost

The Employment Judge refused the claimant's application for interim relief.

Legal Issues (1)
  • Application for interim relief under s.128 ERA 1996.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
3307574/20237 May 2026
struck_out

The claimant's complaints were struck out because she failed to pay the £900 deposit ordered at a preliminary hearing.

Legal Issues (1)
  • Strike-out under rule 40(4) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for non-payment of a deposit ordered at a preliminary hearing.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6010455/20256 May 2026
lost

The unfair dismissal claim was struck out due to insufficient service, and the discrimination claim was dismissed as out of time with no grounds for a just and equitable extension.

Legal Issues (2)
  • Section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996 (two-year qualifying service for unfair dismissal); Section 123 Equality Act 2010 (time limits for discrimination claims
  • just and equitable extension); strike out for non-compliance with tribunal orders.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision

Data sources

Decisions are sourced from official GOV.UK Employment Tribunal publications.

Important: Summaries and statistics are automated. Always verify against the original decision documents.