Sector Report
Finance Tribunal Data Analysis
Latest legal precedents and outcome patterns in the Finance sector based on our 12-month database analysis.
69Cases Analysed (Last 12 Months)
Historical Finance decisions from our database catalog.
32%Success Factor
Proportion of claims won or split/upheld in our database.
68%Dismissal Rate
Claims lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
↑ Strongest IndicatorUnfair Dismissal (27% Success)
↓ Weakest IndicatorPattern Emerging...
Search by Claim Type
Showing 7 cases from the last 2 months.
6022473/2025 • 5 Feb 2026
struck_out
The claim was struck out because the claimant had no reasonable prospect of success, lacking employee status and territorial jurisdiction.
Legal Issues (3)
- Employment status (whether claimant was an employee)
- territorial jurisdiction
- and application of Rule 38 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 to strike out claims with no reasonable prospect of success.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6009795/2024 • 4 Feb 2026
struck_out
The Tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal’s order and failed to engage with the disclosure process.
Legal Issues (1)
- Application of Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 to strike out a claim for non‑compliance with a Tribunal order and lack of engagement; consideration of the overriding objective under Rule 3.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6008864/2025 • 2 Feb 2026
won
The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to unpaid holiday pay, that the £230 deduction was unauthorised, and that the taxi expense was a properly incurred business cost.
Legal Issues (1)
- Breach of contract for unpaid holiday pay; unauthorised wage deduction contrary to s13 Employment Rights Act 1996; entitlement to expense reimbursement under the employment contract; compliance with Working Time Regulations 1998 regarding notice for compulsory leave.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
8001650/2024 • 30 Jan 2026
lost
The Tribunal concluded the redundancy was genuine, the consultation and selection process met legal requirements and there was no evidence of maternity discrimination, so the claimant's claims were dismissed.
Legal Issues (1)
- Whether the redundancy was genuine and complied with the statutory fairness test; adequacy of collective and individual consultation; reasonableness of the selection criteria and consideration of alternative employment under the Maternity & Parental Leave Regulations 1999; whether the dismissal was connected to pregnancy or maternity leave constituting discrimination under the Equality Act 2010; application of Polkey reductions and mitigation.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6009547/2025 • 29 Jan 2026
lost
The tribunal found the handbook clause to be a valid contractual provision authorising the deduction, so the claim for unlawful deduction of wages was dismissed.
Legal Issues (3)
- Whether the deduction was authorised under s13(1)(a) ERA by a ‘relevant provision’ of the contract
- the existence and effect of the handbook term
- and whether prior practice amounted to a waiver or variation of that term.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
2216961/2024 • 29 Jan 2026
lost
All four claims were found to be not well‑founded and were dismissed.
Legal Issues (5)
- Application of the Equality Act 2010 to direct race discrimination
- the duty to make reasonable adjustments for disability
- the test for victimisation and protected‑disclosure detriment
- the burden of proof on the claimant and the employer
- and the interpretation of substantial disadvantage and reasonable adjustments.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
3303093/2021 • 29 Jan 2026
lost
All of the claimant’s discrimination, harassment and constructive unfair dismissal claims were dismissed as either outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction or not well‑founded.
Legal Issues (5)
- Jurisdiction under s 123(1) Equality Act 2010
- reasonable prospect of success test for discrimination claims
- indirect vs direct discrimination
- race‑related harassment
- constructive unfair dismissal and the Polkey principle on hypothetical dismissal.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
Data sources
Decisions are sourced from official GOV.UK Employment Tribunal publications.
Important: Summaries and statistics are automated. Always verify against the original decision documents.