9 Oct 2026

Mixed outcome£16,325.65 awarded

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Breach of Contract and Other

The claimant succeeded on unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal, but failed on direct sex discrimination and a claim under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002; compensation was awarded for wrongful dismissal and a basic award for unfair dismissal, with reductions applied.

Legal Issues (4)

Direct sex discrimination
unfair dismissal with Polkey reduction and reduction for contributory fault
wrongful dismissal (breach of contract)
claim under section 38 Employment Act 2002

Reference: 1306966/2024

7 Oct 2026

Mixed outcome

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Whistleblowing and Harassment

The claimant succeeded in his unfair dismissal claim but all other claims (reasonable adjustments, harassment, whistleblowing) were dismissed.

Legal Issues (4)

Whether the dismissal was fair under section 98(4) ERA 1996
whether the respondent breached the duty to make reasonable adjustments under section 21 EqA 2010
whether the claimant was subjected to harassment related to disability under section 26 EqA 2010
whether the claimant suffered detriment because of protected disclosures under section 47B ERA 1996

Reference: 6022030/2024

2 Oct 2026

Claim dismissed

Discrimination and Breach of Contract

Both claims were dismissed on the merits; the Tribunal found no breach of contract and no failure to make reasonable adjustments.

Legal Issues (6)

Breach of contract
failure to make reasonable adjustments
disability discrimination
knowledge of disadvantage
substantial disadvantage
reasonable steps

Reference: 6004706/2024

25 Sept 2026

Claim dismissed

Discrimination

The claimant's race discrimination claim was dismissed on its merits due to inadequate pleading and lack of credible evidence.

Legal Issues (3)

Race discrimination
pleading standards
credibility assessment

Reference: 6028581/2025

25 Sept 2026

Claim struck out

Constructive Dismissal, Discrimination, Whistleblowing and Harassment

The claimant's claims were struck out in their entirety because his threatening and abusive conduct made a fair trial impossible and no lesser alternative was proportionate.

Legal Issues (4)

Strike-out under rule 38(1)(b) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for unreasonable conduct
application of Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd v James and Bailey v Aviva Employment Services Ltd
consideration of whether a fair trial remains possible and proportionality
impact of claimant's mental health on conduct and case management

Reference: 6023584/2024

25 Sept 2026

Mixed outcome

Discrimination

The tribunal found that four of the reasonable adjustment complaints succeeded, while the remaining complaints were dismissed.

Legal Issues (1)

Whether the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments for disability under sections 20-21 of the Equality Act 2010

Reference: 6031925/2025

23 Sept 2026

Claim dismissed

Discrimination, Harassment and Other

All claims of discrimination, harassment and victimisation were dismissed after a full merits hearing, the tribunal finding the alleged treatment was not unfavourable, was justified, or was not related to the protected characteristics.

Legal Issues (8)

Discrimination arising from disability (section 15 Equality Act 2010)
failure to make reasonable adjustments (section 20/21)
victimisation (section 27)
harassment (section 26)
time limits
justification defence
burden of proof
partnership liability

Reference: 6020095/2024

19 Sept 2026

Claim struck out

Whistleblowing

No claim succeeded and no claims remain ongoing. Claim outcomes: whistleblowing: struck_out.

Legal Issues (2)

Time limit for presenting a whistleblowing detriment claim under section 48(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
whether it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time

Reference: 6006386/2025

18 Sept 2026

Mixed outcome£7,144.11 awarded

Harassment and Other

The claimant succeeded on two sexual harassment claims but all other claims were dismissed.

Legal Issues (2)

Sexual harassment under the Equality Act 2010
dismissal of all other claims

Reference: 6014383/2025

18 Sept 2026

Dismissed on jurisdiction

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

All claims dismissed because they were presented outside the applicable time limit.

Legal Issues (3)

Time limits for presenting employment tribunal claims
constructive unfair dismissal
race and religion or belief discrimination

Reference: 6033424/2025

15 Sept 2026

Claim dismissed

Unpaid Wages

The claim was dismissed because it was presented outside the three-month time limit and the claimant failed to show it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time.

Legal Issues (3)

Whether the claim for unlawful deduction from wages was presented within the three-month time limit under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
application of the 'reasonably practicable' test
effect of ACAS Early Conciliation when started after expiry of primary time limit

Reference: 6006571/2026

15 Sept 2026

Mixed outcome

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Harassment

The claimant's disability discrimination and harassment claims were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success, and the victimisation claim was also struck out as out of time; the unfair dismissal claim remains to be heard.

Legal Issues (4)

Whether the claimant was a disabled person under s.6 Equality Act 2010
whether discrimination claims had reasonable prospects of success
time limits for victimisation claims
whether a deposit order should be made in respect of the unfair dismissal claim

Reference: 2407443/2024

14 Sept 2026

Claimant won

Redundancy Pay

The Tribunal upheld the collective redundancy consultation complaint and made a protective award of 63 days' remuneration, although no monetary total was specified.

Legal Issues (4)

Whether the respondent failed to comply with its collective redundancy consultation obligations under section 188 TULR(C)A 1992 and
if so
the appropriate protective award under section 189(3)
including the 63-day remuneration period and application of the Recoupment Regulations

Reference: 3304521/2025

14 Sept 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal and Unpaid Wages

The claim was dismissed because it was presented out of time and it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, meaning the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.

Legal Issues (5)

Whether the claim was presented in time
application of the 'reasonably practicable' test under sections 111 and 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
whether ill health (mental and physical) constituted an impediment
credibility of claimant's evidence regarding incapacity
the reasonable further period test

Reference: 2300861/2026

14 Sept 2026

Mixed outcome£23,698.81 awarded

Unfair Dismissal and Other

The Claimant succeeded on her claims for unfair dismissal and a protective award but failed on her claim for automatic unfair dismissal under TUPE; the overall outcome is split.

Legal Issues (4)

Whether the dismissal was unfair due to flawed consultation and appeal
whether there was a service provision change under TUPE
whether the employer complied with collective consultation obligations under section 188 TULRCA
the appropriate length of the protective award

Reference: 6009124/2025

14 Sept 2026

Mixed outcome

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

The claimant succeeded on constructive unfair dismissal and discrimination arising from disability, but failed on direct age discrimination; the reasonable adjustments claim was withdrawn.

Legal Issues (4)

Constructive unfair dismissal (breach of implied term of trust and confidence)
discrimination arising from disability (s.15 Equality Act 2010)
direct age discrimination
failure to make reasonable adjustments (withdrawn)

Reference: 2412235/2023

10 Sept 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Breach of Contract

All claims (unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and disability discrimination) were dismissed, with the unfair dismissal and breach of contract claims failing on their merits and the discrimination claim struck out for being out of time.

Legal Issues (1)

Constructive dismissal: whether the employer's conduct breached the implied term of trust and confidence and amounted to a repudiatory breach. Breach of contract: whether an implied term for an exit payment could be established (certainty, agreement to agree). Disability discrimination: application of time limits and just and equitable extension

Reference: 3302486/2024

10 Sept 2026

Claim struck out

Whistleblowing

The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to attend the hearing and the tribunal could not proceed fairly in her absence.

Legal Issues (3)

Application of Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for non-attendance
consideration of fairness and prejudice when a party fails to attend
inability to determine the claim without evidence from the claimant

Reference: 6015639/2025

9 Sept 2026

Claim dismissed

Discrimination and Harassment

All claims under the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed on their merits; the Tribunal found no breach of duty.

Legal Issues (7)

Disability discrimination under sections 15
20
21
26
27 of the Equality Act 2010
time limit for presenting claims under s123 EqA
whether it would be just and equitable to extend time

Reference: 2401460/2024

9 Sept 2026

Claim dismissed

Discrimination and Other

All claims dismissed as the claimant and her daughter were found not to be disabled, and the time-off claim failed.

Legal Issues (2)

Definition of disability under section 6 Equality Act 2010
statutory requirements for time off for dependents under section 57A Employment Rights Act 1996

Reference: 6023106/2024

9 Sept 2026

Claimant won

Unfair Dismissal

The claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim succeeded because the employer fundamentally breached the implied term of trust and confidence and the resignation was in response to that breach.

Legal Issues (6)

Constructive dismissal
breach of implied term of trust and confidence
unfair dismissal
reliance on unimplemented policy
procedural fairness in disciplinary and grievance processes
last straw doctrine

Reference: 3300530/2025

8 Sept 2026

Claim struck out

Other

The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend or be represented at the hearing, and the postponement application was refused for lack of supporting evidence and exceptional circumstances.

Legal Issues (1)

The key legal issues are the application of rule 47 (dismissal for failure to attend) and rule 32 (postponement on medical grounds) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. The Tribunal considered whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying the failure to provide evidence and whether the claim should be dismissed

Reference: 2306335/2023

7 Sept 2026

Mixed outcome

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Unpaid Wages and Harassment

The claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, wages, and race harassment were dismissed, while some allegations of disability discrimination and harassment succeeded, with remedy to be determined.

Legal Issues (7)

Disability discrimination (direct, section 15, reasonable adjustments)
disability-related harassment
race harassment
constructive unfair dismissal
unlawful deduction from wages
holiday pay
extension of time limits

Reference: 1403192/2024

6 Sept 2026

Claim struck out

Other

All claims were struck out because the claimant failed to comply with a case management order and a further order requiring her to accept the list of issues, making a fair trial impossible.

Legal Issues (4)

Strike out for non-compliance with case management orders
whether a fair trial was possible
proportionality of strike out
consideration of claimant's disabilities

Reference: 2302288/2022

4 Sept 2026

Claim dismissed

Discrimination and Harassment

All of the claimant's discrimination and harassment claims were dismissed as not well-founded after a full merits hearing, with the tribunal finding that the respondent's actions were not discriminatory and were justified by legitimate patient safety concerns.

Legal Issues (12)

The key legal issues included whether the respondent had knowledge of the claimant's disability
whether the claimant was treated unfavourably because of something arising from her disability
whether the respondent applied provisions
criteria or practices that placed the claimant at a substantial disadvantage
whether the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments
whether the claimant was harassed related to her disability
whether the claimant was treated less favourably because of her race or age. The tribunal also considered the application of the Equality Act 2010
including sections on direct discrimination
indirect discrimination
duty to make reasonable adjustments
discrimination arising from disability
harassment

Reference: 3300427/2022

3 Sept 2026

Mixed outcome£3,809.79 awarded

Unfair Dismissal, Unpaid Wages and Breach of Contract

The tribunal dismissed unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims for lack of jurisdiction (claimant was not an employee) but upheld the holiday pay claim, awarding £3809.79.

Legal Issues (6)

Employment status – whether claimant was employee or worker
mutuality of obligations
personal service
control
worker definition under s.230 ERA
entitlement to holiday pay under Working Time Regulations

Reference: 6022446/2024

3 Sept 2026

Dismissed on jurisdiction

Constructive Dismissal

The claim was dismissed because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction due to late presentation; it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time.

Legal Issues (4)

Jurisdiction under s111 Employment Rights Act 1996
time limit for unfair dismissal claims
test of reasonable practicability
effect of internal process and ill health on ability to present claim in time

Reference: 2600176/2026

3 Sept 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal

The tribunal found the respondent acted reasonably in dismissing the claimant for misconduct after a fair investigation and process.

Legal Issues (5)

Fairness of dismissal for conduct under s98(4) ERA
application of Burchell test
band of reasonable responses
adequacy of investigation
procedural fairness

Reference: 3301579/2025

3 Sept 2026

Dismissed on jurisdiction

Unfair Dismissal

The claim was dismissed because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction as the claim was lodged 9 months before the alleged dismissal.

Legal Issues (2)

Jurisdiction - claim presented before dismissal occurred
premature claim

Reference: 6045969/2025

2 Sept 2026

Dismissed on jurisdiction

Discrimination

The claimant failed to prove she was a disabled person at the material time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the discrimination claim.

Legal Issues (3)

Definition of disability under s6 Equality Act 2010
burden of proof on claimant to show substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities at the material time
alternative strike-out under Rule 38 for no reasonable prospects

Reference: 3201092/2024

2 Sept 2026

Mixed outcome£5,284.22 awarded

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

The claimant succeeded on her constructive unfair dismissal claim but lost on all discrimination claims.

Legal Issues (4)

Constructive unfair dismissal
pregnancy and maternity discrimination
indirect sex discrimination
direct sex discrimination

Reference: 2407290/2024

2 Sept 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Unpaid Wages and Breach of Contract

All claims were dismissed on the merits; the tribunal found the dismissal fair and no discrimination or unlawful deductions occurred.

Legal Issues (5)

Definition of philosophical belief under s.10 Equality Act 2010
fairness of dismissal under s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
disability definition and reasonable adjustments
discrimination arising from disability
unlawful deduction from wages

Reference: 3303282/2021

1 Sept 2026

Partial decision

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Redundancy Pay, Unpaid Wages, Breach of Contract, Harassment and Other

The only final outcomes are the strike-out of the harassment claim and the dismissal of several claims upon withdrawal; no substantive merits determination was made on the remaining claims.

Legal Issues (4)

Employment status (employee vs worker)
disability definition under Equality Act 2010
strike-out of harassment claim
withdrawal of claims

Reference: 3301421/2024

1 Sept 2026

Claimant won£86,142.96 awarded

Other

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £86,142.96 as gross compensation for pension losses, so the claimant succeeded in obtaining that remedy.

Legal Issues (2)

Assessment and award of pension losses as monetary compensation
gross amount payable by the respondent

Reference: 6019332/2024

28 Aug 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal, Unpaid Wages and Whistleblowing

All claims were dismissed or struck out; the claimant did not succeed on any claim.

Legal Issues (5)

Continuous service requirement for unfair dismissal
time limits and jurisdiction for unlawful deductions
definition of wages
early conciliation certificate naming wrong respondent
whether a person giving instructions can be deemed an employer

Reference: 6002805/2026

27 Aug 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal

The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed as not well-founded.

Legal Issues (1)

Unfair dismissal

Reference: 6014350/2024

26 Aug 2026

Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal and Redundancy Pay

The claimant's claims were struck out because he lacked the two years' qualifying service, had resigned (not constructive dismissal), failed to comply with orders, and did not attend the hearing.

Legal Issues (5)

Qualifying service for unfair dismissal and redundancy claims
strike out for no reasonable prospect of success
non-compliance with orders
not actively pursued
failure to attend hearing

Reference: 6031499/2025

26 Aug 2026

Claim dismissed

Discrimination and Harassment

The Tribunal dismissed all claims of race discrimination and harassment, finding that the treatment complained of was not because of race and that the respondents had provided credible non-discriminatory explanations.

Legal Issues (5)

Direct discrimination (section 13 Equality Act 2010)
harassment (section 26 Equality Act 2010)
burden of proof (section 136 Equality Act 2010)
comparator analysis
vicarious liability (section 109 Equality Act 2010)

Reference: 8002048/2025

26 Aug 2026

Dismissed on jurisdiction

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Unpaid Wages

All claims (unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, and race discrimination) were dismissed because they were presented out of time and no extension was granted.

Legal Issues (8)

Whether the claims for unfair dismissal
unlawful deduction from wages
race discrimination were presented within the statutory time limits. For unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction: whether it was not reasonably practicable to present in time and
if so
whether they were presented within a further reasonable period. For race discrimination: whether it is just and equitable to extend time. The tribunal applied the tests from Wall's Meat Co v Khan
Palmer v Southend-on-Sea
Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
among others

Reference: 1401894/2025

25 Aug 2026

Claim dismissed

Other

The claimant's reconsideration application was refused because withdrawal of a claim is not a judgment and cannot be reconsidered; the original claim was withdrawn and dismissed.

Legal Issues (7)

Reconsideration jurisdiction
withdrawal of claim
res judicata
without prejudice privilege
duress
capacity
costs threat

Reference: 6007512/2024

24 Aug 2026

Mixed outcome£241.80 awarded

Unfair Dismissal and Unpaid Wages

The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed, but his claim for unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded regarding work on 7th November 2024.

Legal Issues (2)

Unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996
unlawful deduction from wages under the Employment Rights Act 1996 Part II

Reference: 6024134/2025

24 Aug 2026

Claim dismissed

Unpaid Wages

The claim failed because the Band 8d job evaluation outcome did not create a contractual entitlement: the requisite signatories (line manager, budget holder and DDO) did not approve the form, so there was no valid contractual variation.

Legal Issues (5)

Whether the claimant had a contractual entitlement to Band 8d pay through the NHS Agenda for Change job evaluation scheme
interpretation of the contract and Job Evaluation Handbook
whether the job evaluation outcome alone varied the contract
whether wages were 'properly payable' under section 13 ERA 1996
whether proper managerial authorisation was a necessary condition for contractual variation

Reference: 6037829/2025

24 Aug 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

All complaints were dismissed as not well founded after a full merits hearing.

Legal Issues (3)

Disability discrimination
constructive dismissal under the Equality Act
constructive unfair dismissal

Reference: 2404864/2024

22 Aug 2026

Mixed outcome

Discrimination, Unpaid Wages and Harassment

The claimant succeeded on three victimisation claims but failed on other discrimination, harassment, and most wage deduction claims, with no monetary award made at this liability stage.

Legal Issues (7)

Victimisation under Equality Act 2010 s.27
unlawful deduction from wages under ERA 1996 s.13
direct race discrimination
race-related harassment
pregnancy discrimination
failure to make reasonable adjustments
jurisdiction and time limits

Reference: 2302173/2023

22 Aug 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Unpaid Wages, Breach of Contract and Harassment

All complaints were dismissed on their merits after a full hearing.

Legal Issues (8)

Whether the claimant was dismissed within the meaning of section 39(7)(b) of the Equality Act 2010
whether harassment under section 26 EQA occurred
whether direct discrimination under section 13 EQA occurred
whether there was an unauthorised deduction from wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996
whether holiday pay was underpaid under the Working Time Regulations 1998
whether the respondent breached the contract of employment regarding notice
remuneration
holiday pay

Reference: 3306494/2024

20 Aug 2026

Claim dismissed

Discrimination and Harassment

All claims were either withdrawn or dismissed on their merits; the sole well-founded s.15 claim was dismissed as out of time, so the claimant achieved no substantive success.

Legal Issues (10)

The key legal issues concerned the interpretation and application of sections 15
19
20
21
26
27 of the Equality Act 2010
including the burden of proof
causation
reasonable adjustments
time limits

Reference: 2408690/2023

20 Aug 2026

Mixed outcome

Constructive Dismissal, Discrimination, Unpaid Wages and Harassment

The claimant succeeded on two specific victimisation detriments but lost on all other claims, with the wages claim for unpaid annual leave on termination still undetermined.

Legal Issues (3)

Constructive unfair dismissal
disability discrimination (including harassment, discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, victimisation)
unauthorised deductions from wages

Reference: 2409234/2023

19 Aug 2026

Claimant won£4,760 awarded

Unpaid Wages

The claimant succeeded in her claim for unauthorised deductions from wages; the respondent failed to attend the final hearing and the Tribunal awarded wages arrears and compensation.

Legal Issues (2)

Unauthorised deductions from wages under the Employment Rights Act 1996
default judgment in absence of respondent

Reference: 6027224/2025

19 Aug 2026

Claim dismissed

Whistleblowing

The claimant's complaints of detriment on grounds of public interest disclosure were dismissed after the tribunal found no causal link between the protected disclosures and the alleged detriments.

Legal Issues (5)

Whether the claimant made protected disclosures under s.43B ERA 1996
whether she suffered detriments
whether the detriments were on the ground of the disclosures
burden of proof under s.48(2)
time limits under s.48(3)

Reference: 6021800/2025

18 Aug 2026

Claimant won£14,381.21 awarded

Unpaid Wages

The claimant succeeded in his claim for unpaid wages as a worker under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Legal Issues (3)

Whether the claimant was a worker under s.230(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
whether the respondent made unlawful deductions from wages under s.13 ERA
calculation of unpaid earnings

Reference: 8003210/2025

Search by Claim Type

Employers in recent Healthcare decisions

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Breach of Contract and Other

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Whistleblowing and Harassment

Discrimination and Breach of Contract

Discrimination

Constructive Dismissal, Discrimination, Whistleblowing and Harassment

Discrimination

Discrimination, Harassment and Other

Whistleblowing

Harassment and Other

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

Unpaid Wages

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Harassment

Redundancy Pay

Unfair Dismissal and Unpaid Wages

Unfair Dismissal and Other

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Breach of Contract

Whistleblowing

Discrimination and Harassment

Discrimination and Other

Unfair Dismissal

Other

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Unpaid Wages and Harassment

Other

Discrimination and Harassment

Unfair Dismissal, Unpaid Wages and Breach of Contract

Constructive Dismissal

Unfair Dismissal

Unfair Dismissal

Discrimination

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Unpaid Wages and Breach of Contract

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Redundancy Pay, Unpaid Wages, Breach of Contract, Harassment and Other

Other

Unfair Dismissal, Unpaid Wages and Whistleblowing

Unfair Dismissal

Unfair Dismissal and Redundancy Pay

Discrimination and Harassment

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Unpaid Wages

Other

Unfair Dismissal and Unpaid Wages

Unpaid Wages

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

Discrimination, Unpaid Wages and Harassment

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Unpaid Wages, Breach of Contract and Harassment

Discrimination and Harassment

Constructive Dismissal, Discrimination, Unpaid Wages and Harassment

Unpaid Wages

Whistleblowing

Unpaid Wages