Sector Report
Manufacturing Tribunal Data Analysis
Latest legal precedents and outcome patterns in the Manufacturing sector based on our 12-month database analysis.
206Cases Analysed (Last 12 Months)
Historical Manufacturing decisions from our database catalog.
55%Success Factor
Proportion of claims won or split/upheld in our database.
45%Dismissal Rate
Claims lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
↑ Strongest IndicatorUnfair dismissal (61% Success)
↓ Weakest IndicatorDiscrimination (20% Success)
Search by Claim Type
Showing 7 cases from the last 2 months.
6017475/2024 • 11 Jun 2026
split
The claimant succeeded on a discrimination arising from disability claim (dismissal) and two harassment claims, but lost on all other claims including direct discrimination, reasonable adjustments, and rest breaks.
Legal Issues (6)
- Disability discrimination (section 15)
- harassment related to disability
- reasonable adjustments
- direct discrimination
- time limits
- and working time regulations.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6022998/2025 • 21 May 2026
lost
The claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were dismissed as not well founded.
Legal Issues (1)
- Not available from judgment text
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6020716/2025 • 15 May 2026
won
Both claimants' claims of unfair dismissal succeeded, although the first claimant received no award due to a 100% Polkey reduction and contributory conduct.
Legal Issues (4)
- Unfair dismissal
- Polkey reductions
- contributory conduct
- and ACAS Code of Practice compliance.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6017489/2024 • 7 May 2026
won
The claimant succeeded in all claims (redundancy payment, holiday pay, notice pay) as the respondent failed to attend or defend the proceedings.
Legal Issues (3)
- Entitlement to statutory redundancy payment under ERA 1996
- holiday pay under Working Time Regulations
- and notice pay under ERA 1996.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6003840/2025 • 6 May 2026
won
The respondent failed to comply with the statutory duty to consult collectively under section 188 TULRCA 1992, resulting in a protective award of 90 days' pay.
Legal Issues (1)
- Failure to consult collectively on redundancies; protective award for a 90-day protected period under s.188 TULRCA 1992.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6005586/2025 • 6 May 2026
won
The respondent failed to comply with the statutory collective consultation obligations, resulting in a protective award of 90 days' pay.
Legal Issues (1)
- Failure to consult under section 188 TULRCA 1992; award of protective period.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
6004743/2025 • 6 May 2026
won
The respondent failed to comply with the requirements of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
Legal Issues (2)
- Failure to consult under section 188 TULRCA 1992
- leading to a protective award of 90 days' pay.
GOV.UK SourceView Decision
Data sources
Decisions are sourced from official GOV.UK Employment Tribunal publications.
Important: Summaries and statistics are automated. Always verify against the original decision documents.