Employment Tribunal decisions and outcome patterns in the Transport & Logistics sector from the last 12 months.
Final Transport & Logistics decisions with at least one determined claim.
Proportion of cases won or split/upheld in our database.
Cases lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
Showing 26 cases from the last 2 months.
Browse the latest published decisions for employers represented in this sector sample.
The entire claim was struck out, first the unfair dismissal complaint for lack of qualifying service, and then the remaining claims for failure to actively pursue the claim.
Reference: 3304574/2025
The Tribunal dismissed all disability discrimination claims on the merits but upheld two claims of unlawful deduction from wages, with remedy to be determined.
Reference: 2409533/2023
All claims were dismissed: breach of contract for lack of jurisdiction, and direct discrimination and harassment on the merits.
Reference: 3306488/2024
All claims were dismissed as the tribunal found that the claimant's dismissal was due to gross misconduct, not his trade union activities or beliefs.
Reference: 6017275/2024
The claimant succeeded on all three claims, with the Tribunal awarding £7,385.05 gross for unauthorised deductions, £591.46 net for notice pay, and making a protective award of 90 days' remuneration.
Reference: 3300074/2025
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because it was presented outside the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to present it in time.
Reference: 2300004/2025
The claimant succeeded in part on reasonable adjustments claims but failed on the claim regarding the attendance management procedure, resulting in a split outcome and an award of £23,410.87.
Reference: 1305252/2024
The claimant succeeded on claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay, notice pay, and redundancy payment, while other claims remain outstanding.
Reference: 3307668/2025
The claimant succeeded on her redundancy payment claim, which was awarded £2100, while other claims remain outstanding.
Reference: 3307683/2025
The claimant succeeded in his whistleblowing detriment claim but failed in his disability discrimination claim; remedy for the successful claim is to be determined at a later hearing.
Reference: 6017871/2024
The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with the early conciliation requirement, as the name on the EC certificate did not match the claimant's name.
Reference: 6012819/2026
The claimant succeeded on all his claims for unlawful deduction of wages, unpaid holiday pay, and constructive dismissal, and the respondent's counterclaim was dismissed.
Reference: 6008108/2026
The claimant succeeded on both claims of unauthorised deductions from wages and unfair dismissal, with the tribunal ordering compensation of £116,670.67.
Reference: 6000839/2025
All of the claimant's complaints were dismissed at the final merits hearing on 1-4 September 2026.
Reference: 6016961/2024
The tribunal dismissed the discrimination claims as not well-founded but upheld the breach of procedure claim, awarding compensation.
Reference: 2601080/2024
All complaints were dismissed as not well-founded after a full merits hearing.
Reference: 2412130/2023
The Tribunal found that the respondent had a genuine belief in misconduct, carried out a reasonable investigation, and dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses; all discrimination, harassment, and victimisation claims were either out of time or not substantiated.
Reference: 3312048/2022
All claims were dismissed: the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and the claimant failed to prove she was disabled for the discrimination claims.
Reference: 6020516/2024
The claimant failed to establish that the respondent breached the duty to make reasonable adjustments or that it directly discriminated against him because of disability; the evidence showed sustained engagement and appropriate adjustments.
Reference: 8001894/2025
All claims were struck out because the claimant failed to actively pursue the case, having not complied with Tribunal orders or communicated with the respondent or the Tribunal.
Reference: 6005969/2025
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success, and the race discrimination claim was struck out after the claimant failed to pay the required deposit order.
Reference: 6007294/2025
The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to consider the complaints, which were therefore dismissed.
Reference: 1604189/2025
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages, and the tribunal ordered payment of £750.00 gross.
Reference: 6000836/2026
All claims were either withdrawn or dismissed, resulting in no success for the claimant on any claim.
Reference: 3305916/2024
The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with Tribunal orders and did not actively pursue the claim, making a fair hearing impossible.
Reference: 6000160/2025
All claims were dismissed because the claimant failed to establish protected disclosures, discrimination, or any unlawful treatment; some claims were also barred by a prior settlement agreement.
Reference: 6014056/2024