Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Adarma Ltd (In Administration).
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
The respondent failed to elect employee representatives and consult as required by law before making 20+ employees redundant, so the complaint was well founded.
The tribunal found the respondent had breached sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act by not electing representatives or consulting before the collective redundancies.
The Tribunal held that the respondent failed to comply with its statutory election and consultation obligations, granting the claimant a protective award for the 90‑day protected period.
The Tribunal held that the respondent breached sections 188 and 188A by not electing representatives or consulting, and therefore awarded the claimant a protective award for the 90‑day protected period.
The employer failed to elect employee representatives and to consult as required by sections 188/188A when carrying out collective redundancies, so the claim was upheld and a protective award was granted.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.