Croydon Employment Tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Croydon.

Recent cases
16
Employers (last 3 months)
16
Recorded awards (last 3 months)
4

£196,392.12 combined

Published decisions

Cases from the last three months

Newest decisions first

12 Aug 2026
Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal

Employer: Mitie Ltd and Others

The claim against the Bank of England was struck out because Mr Freeman was never employed by the Bank, but the claim against the other respondents proceeds.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Whether the Bank of England could be liable for unfair dismissal absent an employment relationship
  • strike out for no reasonable prospects
  • TUPE service provision change implications

Reference: 6022025/2025

7 Aug 2026
Claim dismissed

Discrimination

Employer: Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and Unison Trade Union

The discrimination claims were either out of time or not well-founded on the evidence.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Time limits under s123 Equality Act 2010
  • continuing course of conduct
  • just and equitable extension
  • burden of proof in direct discrimination
  • strike-out for no reasonable prospect of success

Reference: 6009627/2024

6 Aug 2026
Mixed outcome

Discrimination

Employer: Credera Ltd

The age discrimination claim was withdrawn and dismissed, but the victimisation claim survived a strike out application and will proceed to hearing.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Interpretation of protected act in victimisation claim
  • whether claim has reasonable prospects
  • application of withdrawal and strike out principles

Reference: 6014125/2024

28 Jul 2026
Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Breach of Contract

Employer: NSL Ltd

All complaints of unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and disability discrimination were dismissed after a hearing.

Legal Issues (2)
  • The judgment does not specify legal issues
  • it simply records that all complaints failed and were dismissed

Reference: 6007414/2024

27 Jul 2026
Claim dismissed

Other

Employer: Ms J Dawson and Others

The claimant was not an employee or worker because she had a genuine right to substitute, was not subject to sufficient control, and was operating her own business.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Whether the claimant was an employee or worker under s.230 ERA 1996
  • whether there was an obligation of personal service
  • whether the right to substitute was genuine
  • whether the respondents exercised control
  • whether the claimant was in business on her own account

Reference: 2306620/2024

20 Jul 2026
Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Whistleblowing

Employer: Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

All claims were struck out: the whistleblowing claims had no reasonable prospect of success due to previous findings, and the unfair dismissal and victimisation claims were struck out due to the claimant's failure to comply with orders and non-attendance at the final hearing.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Strike out for no reasonable prospect of success (whistleblowing claims)
  • strike out for failure to comply with tribunal orders and non-attendance (unfair dismissal and victimisation)
  • application of Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd v James
  • overriding objective and proportionality

Reference: 2303596/2022

16 Jul 2026
Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Breach of Contract

Employer: Croydon Council

The claims were struck out at a preliminary hearing.

Legal Issues (1)
  • Strike out of claims at preliminary hearing

Reference: 2301026/2025

3 Jul 2026
Claimant won

Redundancy Pay

Employer: LDO Realisations Ltd (in Administration) formerly known as Octagon Developments Ltd (in Administration)

The employer failed to consult collectively before making 20+ employees redundant, so a protective award of 90 days was granted.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Failure to comply with section 188 TULRCA collective consultation obligations
  • protective award discretion under section 189
  • distinction between claimants with satisfactory employment evidence (Annex A) and those without (Annex B)
  • employer insolvency and role of Secretary of State

Reference: 2300884/2025

23 Jun 2026
Claimant won£20,180.79 awarded

Unfair Dismissal

Employer: Clarigo Logistics Ltd

The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was upheld because the respondent did not attend and the tribunal found the dismissal was unfair, awarding compensation for loss of earnings, notice pay, and holiday pay.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Unfair dismissal under section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
  • redundancy
  • notice pay
  • holiday pay
  • recoupment of benefits

Reference: 6007488

23 Jun 2026
Claimant won£46,888 awarded

Unfair Dismissal

Employer: Springbank Contractors Ltd

The claimant was unfairly dismissed as the respondent failed to show a fair reason for dismissal and the claimant was found to be an employee.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Time limit extension under section 111(2)(b) ERA 1996
  • employment status (employee vs. self-employed)
  • unfair dismissal for lack of fair reason
  • ACAS Code of Practice uplift for procedural failure
  • award for failure to provide written statement under section 38 Employment Act 2002

Reference: 6005822/2025

19 Jun 2026
Dismissed on jurisdiction

Other

Employer: Chance Further Supported Living

The claimant was found not to be an employee, so the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the claim.

Legal Issues (2)
  • Whether the claimant was an employee of the respondent
  • jurisdiction of the Employment Tribunal to hear the claim

Reference: 6007017/2025

17 Jun 2026
Claimant won£12,839.95 awarded

Unfair Dismissal

Employer: ONMT Ltd

The complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay a total of £12,839.95 including a 20% uplift for non-compliance with the ACAS Code.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Unfair dismissal under Part X Employment Rights Act 1996
  • failure to follow ACAS Code of Practice
  • recoupment regulations

Reference: 6008241/2025

17 Jun 2026
Claimant won£116,483.38 awarded

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

Employer: Coveo Solutions (UK) Ltd and Coveo EMEA Ltd (formerly Qubit Digital Ltd)

The Claimant succeeded in claims of discrimination and unfair dismissal against the Second Respondent, resulting in a total compensation award of £116,483.38.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Discrimination (pecuniary and non-pecuniary)
  • Unfair Dismissal
  • ACAS Uplift
  • Grossing up of compensation
  • Interest on awards

Reference: 2303416/2024

16 Jun 2026
Outcome unclear

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Unpaid Wages and Breach of Contract

Employer: Faith Health Care Agency

The claimant withdrew his unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims, which were dismissed; the respondent's application to strike out the remaining claims was refused as the claimant had an arguable case and had complied with the tribunal's order.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Withdrawal of claims
  • strike out application for failure to comply with orders and no reasonable prospects
  • tribunal found claimant had arguable case and had complied with order
  • strike out refused

Reference: 2300236/2026

13 Jun 2026
Mixed outcome

Discrimination

Employer: Holiday Extras Ltd

The respondent failed to provide several reasonable adjustments for the claimant's disability, but some allegations of failure were dismissed.

Legal Issues (2)
  • Failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010
  • time limits under section 123 EqA 2010

Reference: 6012387/2024

11 Jun 2026
Mixed outcome

Unfair Dismissal and Unpaid Wages

Employer: Global Partners BD Ltd (T/a Wok and Fire)

The claimant succeeded on unfair dismissal and holiday pay claims but lost on unauthorised deduction from wages.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Unfair dismissal
  • holiday pay
  • unauthorised deduction from wages
  • Polkey reduction
  • contributory fault

Reference: 6036496/2025

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.