Midlands East Employment Tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Midlands East.

Recent cases
9
Employers (last 3 months)
9
Recorded awards (last 3 months)
1

£67,963.69 combined

Published decisions

Cases from the last three months

Newest decisions first

14 Aug 2026
Claim dismissed

Discrimination

Employer: Amazon UK Services Ltd

The claimant was found not to be disabled under the Equality Act 2010, so the reasonable adjustments claim was dismissed.

Legal Issues (1)
  • Whether the claimant was disabled within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material times

Reference: 6028476/2025

31 Jul 2026
Dismissed on jurisdiction

Other

Employer: Sole House Ltd

Claim was presented 18 months out of time with no application to extend, and it was reasonably practicable to present in time, so the tribunal lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the claim.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Time limit for presenting a claim to the Employment Tribunal
  • jurisdiction to hear an out-of-time claim
  • whether it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time

Reference: 2600084/2026

30 Jul 2026
Claim dismissed

Discrimination, Harassment and Other

Employer: Maximus UK Services Ltd

All claims were dismissed because they were submitted out of time and no extension was granted.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Time limits for bringing claims
  • jurisdiction
  • whether it was reasonably practicable to bring claim in time for s.80G
  • whether it is just and equitable to extend time for discrimination and harassment claims

Reference: 2601026/2025

29 Jul 2026
Claimant won£67,963.69 awarded

Unpaid Wages and Breach of Contract

Employer: GOP Equipment Holdings LLC

The respondent failed to pay the claimant various contractual sums and wages, and did not attend the hearing to contest the claims.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Unauthorised deductions from wages
  • breach of contract for severance
  • data handling
  • home office allowances

Reference: 6042674/2025

22 Jul 2026
Claim dismissed

Discrimination

Employer: K Winterburn T/a Kimi Hair and Beauty

The claims were presented after the statutory time limit had expired and the Tribunal declined to extend time as it was not just and equitable to do so.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Time limits under s.123 Equality Act 2010
  • whether it is just and equitable to extend time
  • jurisdiction to hear late claims

Reference: 6007485/2025

2 Jul 2026
Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal, Constructive Dismissal, Discrimination, Redundancy Pay, Unpaid Wages, Whistleblowing, Breach of Contract, Harassment and Other

Employer: Unipart Group Ltd

All claims were dismissed as either not well founded on the facts or brought out of time.

Legal Issues (8)
  • Time limits for discrimination claims
  • disability definition (long-term effect of mental impairment)
  • direct discrimination
  • harassment related to disability and race
  • failure to make reasonable adjustments
  • victimisation
  • unlawful deduction from wages
  • notice pay

Reference: 2600012/2026

24 Jun 2026
Claim dismissed

Discrimination, Harassment and Other

Employer: Department for Work and Pensions and Ms A Walker

The Tribunal dismissed all claims because the claimant failed to establish less favourable treatment, a discriminatory provision criterion or practice, unwanted conduct related to age, or any detriment as a part-time worker, and the part-time worker claim was also out of time.

Legal Issues (8)
  • Direct age discrimination
  • indirect sex discrimination
  • harassment related to age
  • part-time worker detriment
  • time limits
  • burden of proof
  • pool for comparison
  • conduct extending over a period

Reference: 6001793/2024

6 Jun 2026
Claim dismissed

Discrimination and Harassment

Employer: CBVC Vehicle Management Ltd and Mr A Baker

The claimant failed to prove that the comment constituted less favourable treatment or harassment, as he did not complain for 21 months, maintained a professional relationship with the respondent, and the comment was not directed at him.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Whether the use of the racially offensive term amounted to less favourable treatment because of race under s.13 Equality Act 2010 and/or harassment under s.26 Equality Act 2010
  • considering the delay in complaint
  • lack of immediate effect
  • the apology

Reference: 2600468/2024

4 Jun 2026
Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal

Employer: Moulton Medical Centre

The Tribunal found the dismissal was fair because the employer had a genuine reason (capability due to long-term sickness), conducted a reasonable investigation and consultation, and the decision to dismiss fell within the band of reasonable responses.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Whether the dismissal for long-term ill health was fair under s.98 ERA 1996
  • focusing on the employer's reason
  • the band of reasonable responses
  • adequacy of consultation
  • medical investigation

Reference: 2601509/2025

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.