Employment Tribunal decisions and outcome patterns in the Finance sector from the last 12 months.
Final Finance decisions with at least one determined claim.
Proportion of cases won or split/upheld in our database.
Cases lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
Showing 10 cases from the last 2 months.
Browse the latest published decisions for employers represented in this sector sample.
The victimisation complaint was struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success; the remainder of the claim was not struck out.
Reference: 6012917/2024
The claimant succeeded on one discrimination claim (failure to provide a printer) but failed on other discrimination and victimisation claims, and other claims were struck out.
Reference: 2500230/2025
The claim for unauthorised deductions was well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay the deducted sums.
Reference: 6030428/2025
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim failed because the employer had a genuine belief in his misconduct based on reasonable grounds, conducted a fair process, and dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses. The wrongful dismissal claim failed because the claimant's conduct amounted to repudiatory breach.
Reference: 2602082/2024
The claimant's claims were dismissed because the tribunal found his evidence unreliable and dishonest, and concluded that the respondent did not breach the implied term of trust and confidence or commit any repudiatory breach of contract.
Reference: 1402038/2025
The tribunal found that the ESA was expressly incorporated into the claimants' contracts through the reference to the RPA in their appointment letters, and that the ESA's enhanced redundancy pay clause (4 weeks per year of service) was a contractual entitlement.
Reference: 3306622/2024
The claim was struck out because the claimant had not actively pursued it and a fair hearing was no longer possible.
Reference: 6014286/2024
The respondent failed to present a valid response, leading to a default judgment in favour of the claimant on all claims.
Reference: 6034070/2025
Claimant succeeded against first respondent for unpaid wages, redundancy, and holiday pay; claim against second respondent dismissed as not employer.
Reference: 3304517/2025
Both complaints of unfair constructive dismissal and disability discrimination were dismissed as not well-founded.
Reference: 6004402/2025
Decisions are sourced from official GOV.UK Employment Tribunal publications.
Important: Summaries and statistics are automated. Always verify against the original decision documents.