Discrimination and Whistleblowing
Heard at Reading
All claims were dismissed because the Tribunal found that the respondent's actions were not discriminatory, the alleged provision, criterion or practice did not exist, the claimant was not subjected to a detriment for a protected act, and the email relied upon as a protected disclosure was not in the public interest, and the reason for dismissal was redundancy.
Legal Issues (4)
- Whether the claimant was subjected to direct disability discrimination
- whether the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments
- whether the claimant was victimised for raising a grievance
- whether the claimant was automatically unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure
Reference: 3300319/2024
