Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Manchester.
£282,098.49 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: The Crafted Experience Ltd
The respondent failed to present a valid response, and the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was found well-founded.
Reference: 2406850/2025
Employer: The Crafted Experience Ltd
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and failed to file a valid response, leading to a default judgment in the claimant's favour.
Reference: 2404236/2026
Employer: The Floorbrite Group Ltd
Both claims were struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success and were not being actively pursued by the claimant.
Reference: 6022793/2025
Employer: Elite Bars & Pubs Ltd
The respondent failed to file a valid response, and the Legal Officer found the claims of unauthorised deductions and breach of contract (notice pay) to be well-founded.
Reference: 6005886/2026
Employer: Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd
The tribunal dismissed all disability discrimination claims because the evidence did not establish that the claimant was placed at a substantial disadvantage by any PCP, nor that the treatment complained of was unfavourable because of something arising in consequence of her disability.
Reference: 6005622/2024
Employer: Manchester Abattoir Ltd
The Tribunal upheld jurisdiction for the Equality Act claims but dismissed the non-Equality Act claims for lack of jurisdiction.
Reference: 6014505/2025
Employer: British Gas Trading Ltd
All complaints were dismissed as not well founded on their merits.
Reference: 2404334/2024
Employer: Dukinfield Engineering Ltd
The claimant won on all remaining claims (wrongful dismissal, unlawful deductions, holiday pay, and redundancy) after the respondent failed to respond and the discrimination/whistleblowing claims were withdrawn.
Reference: 2404432/2025
Employer: Morrison Data Services Ltd
The claimant's claims for discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments were not well founded and failed.
Reference: 2500244/2024
Employer: Victorious Academies Trust
The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded, but liability only was determined with remedy to be assessed later.
Reference: 6014556/2025
Employer: Airmatic Ltd
Both complaints were dismissed as not well-founded after a full hearing.
Reference: 2405614/2025
Employer: Wirral Borough Council
All claims were dismissed: disability discrimination struck out for failure to prove disability, unfair dismissal dismissed as procedurally fair and within range of reasonable responses, and unpaid holiday pay claim dismissed because the claimant had in fact been overpaid.
Reference: 2412216/2023
Employer: Alternative Approach Supported Accommodation Ltd
The claimant succeeded on her disability discrimination claims, with the Tribunal awarding compensation for financial loss and injury to feelings.
Reference: 6024757/2025
Employer: Champdog Films Ltd
The respondent failed to respond to the claim, leading to a default judgment in favour of the claimant for unauthorised deductions and unpaid holiday pay.
Reference: 6003929/2026
Employer: Printstat Ltd
The respondent failed to respond and the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,131.00.
Reference: 6035057/2025
Employer: PVTEC Ltd
The respondent failed to pay the claimant's full wages, notice pay, and accrued holiday pay, and the tribunal found all three claims well-founded.
Reference: 2401723/2025
Employer: Intesa Communications Ltd
Respondent failed to present a valid response, leading to default judgment in favour of the claimant on both wages and breach of contract claims.
Reference: 6043315/2025
Employer: Work with Vista Ltd
The claimant succeeded on the unlawful deduction of wages (commission) claim but lost on holiday pay and notice pay claims.
Reference: 6038011/2025
Employer: Herbprime Co Ltd
Claimant succeeded on both unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims.
Reference: 2402185/2023
Employer: Extons Foods Ltd and Proman Supply Chain Ltd
The claimant was not disabled under the Equality Act 2010 at the material time, so his disability discrimination claims were dismissed.
Reference: 2400006/2023
The claimant was not an employee of the first respondent, but an agency worker, and therefore not entitled to unpaid wages, holiday pay or a redundancy payment from the National Insurance Fund.
Reference: 6040796/2026
Employer: AJ&D Chapelhow (Cliburn) Ltd
The tribunal found that the claimant was fairly dismissed, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Reference: 6021400/2025
Employer: Whitbread Group plc
All three claims were dismissed on the merits: the claimant was not denied rest breaks, the employer made out the statutory defence to harassment, and there was no repudiatory breach causing the resignation.
Reference: 6008264/2024
Employer: E3 Associates Ltd
The claim for unlawful deduction from wages was found well founded because the respondent failed to attend and the judge accepted the claimant's evidence.
Reference: 6047426/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.