Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Manchester.
£51,107.35 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Moradia Ltd and Others
This is an interim relief application (not a final substantive verdict); the Claimant's application succeeded, ordering continued employment and monthly payments of £3,833.33 gross pending final determination.
Employer: Manchester United Football Club Ltd
The respondent's application to strike out the claim was refused, so the claim continues.
Employer: Lancashire County Council
The Tribunal found it was not likely that at a final hearing the reason for dismissal would be held to be a protected disclosure, so interim relief was refused.
Employer: ANS Group Ltd
The claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed as the respondent's conduct amounted to a fundamental breach of contract entitling the claimant to resign.
Employer: Greenwood & Coope Ltd
All complaints were found not well-founded and were dismissed by the Tribunal.
Employer: Precious Little Ones Ltd
The claimant's claims were dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the hearing.
Employer: Blackpool Borough Council
The Tribunal found that it was not likely that the principal reason for the claimant's dismissal was because he made protected disclosures, so the application for interim relief was refused.
Employer: ADHD Foundation (In Voluntary Liquidation)
The claimant succeeded on claims for whistleblowing detriment, unfair dismissal, disability discrimination (reasonable adjustments and victimisation) but lost on sex discrimination and discrimination arising from disability.
Employer: Williams Motor Group (Williams BMW Liverpool)
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of qualifying service, and his other claims for bonus, holiday pay, and notice pay were dismissed as not well founded or lacking jurisdiction.
Employer: Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
The Tribunal found that the respondent did not breach its duty to make reasonable adjustments and the complaint of discrimination arising from disability was not well-founded, dismissing all remaining claims.
Employer: Westby Cleaning Services
The claimant succeeded in part (the respondent admitted owing £149.63 for 10.5 hours) but failed to prove the disputed 2.5 hours, so that part of the claim was dismissed.
Employer: Salford Software Ltd and Proofid Ltd
All of the claimant's complaints were dismissed because the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed for gross misconduct (dishonesty), not for making protected disclosures or on the grounds of sex, and he was not entitled to the bonus or holiday pay claimed.
Employer: AstraZeneca UK Ltd
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed for being presented out of time, but the discrimination claim was allowed to proceed after a just and equitable extension.
Employer: HM Prison and Probation Service
The claims were struck out because they were not presented within the statutory time limit and there was no reasonable prospect of extending time on a just and equitable basis.
Employer: Hopwood Hall College
The substantive claim has not been determined; this judgment solely concerns a costs order against the claimant for the respondent's wasted costs due to the claimant's unreasonable conduct and late adjournment.
Employer: Bright HR Ltd
The claimant won his unfair dismissal claim but lost his disability discrimination claim, resulting in a split verdict.
Employer: Foundation Coffee House Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation)
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of service, but the victimisation and breach of contract claims succeeded, resulting in a split outcome.
Employer: Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
The Tribunal found that the claimant was disabled at the relevant time due to his knee impairment.
Employer: Bayfield’s Group Ltd
The claimant was unfairly dismissed and the parties agreed on compensation of £18,000 by consent.
Employer: Connex Education Partnership Ltd
The Tribunal found the claims for less favourable treatment under the AWR 2010 and unauthorised deductions from wages were not well-founded.
Employer: Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
The claim was presented in time but not via a prescribed method; the Tribunal waived the requirement to comply with the Practice Direction, allowing the claim to continue to a final hearing.
Employer: Manchester City Council
The claimant's disability discrimination complaints were dismissed because they were presented outside the statutory time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time.
Employer: Dippy Co Ltd
Three claimants succeeded in their unfair dismissal claims, but Mr K Platt's claim was dismissed due to non-attendance.
Employer: Castlefield Hospitality Ltd
The respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages, and the claims for unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract were well founded.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.