Disability discrimination and breach of contract
Employer: 3DGBIRE Ltd
All complaints of disability discrimination and breach of contract were dismissed as not well-founded.
Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Manchester.
£30,359.32 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: 3DGBIRE Ltd
All complaints of disability discrimination and breach of contract were dismissed as not well-founded.
Employer: St Helens Rota Ltd
The claimant was not a worker as defined by statute because she operated her own locum business with no mutual obligation to accept or offer work and was free to walk away without notice.
Employer: BT plc and EE Ltd
One specific allegation of harassment was struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success, while the remainder of the strike out application was refused.
Employer: ECig Store Ltd
All claims dismissed because they were presented outside the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to present them in time.
Employer: Pertemps Network Group Ltd and The Talent Crowd Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation)
This was a preliminary hearing regarding employment status; the first respondent was dismissed, but the claims against the second respondent are permitted to proceed to a final hearing.
Employer: Nightstop Communities Northwest C.I.C.
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and failed to provide a written statement of particulars, both claims being well-founded.
Employer: Bay Freight Ltd
The claim for unfair constructive dismissal was found to be well-founded and the respondent agreed to pay the sum claimed for unlawful deduction from wages.
Employer: Bury Council
The tribunal concluded that the respondent had presented a cogent and rational business case for redundancy, undertook collective consultation, and offered individual consultation which the claimant refused, making it unlikely that the principal reason for dismissal was the claimant's protected disclosures.
Employer: H Demetrios (T/a Brook Hall Hotel)
All claims were dismissed because they were not presented within the applicable time limits and no extension was granted.
Employer: Format Creative Studio Ltd
The claimant succeeded on the redundancy payment claim but failed on the breach of contract claim for notice pay.
Employer: Solo NW Ltd
The claimant succeeded on a breach of contract claim for notice pay but his unfair dismissal claim was struck out due to insufficient service, and other claims were dismissed.
Employer: Santangeli Ltd
The claimants succeeded because the respondent made them redundant without paying the required redundancy payments, notice pay, and made unauthorized deductions from wages.
Employer: Ryan Speciality Corporate Services Ltd
The majority of the claims were struck out for having no reasonable prospects of success, while others were subject to deposit orders or Unless Orders.
Employer: Hyperoptic Ltd
The claimant did not meet the statutory definition of disability at the relevant times, so all disability discrimination claims were dismissed.
Employer: Swan’s Travel Ltd
The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
Employer: The Stockport Canal Boat Trust for Disabled People
The claimant's complaints of constructive unfair dismissal and detriment were dismissed because the tribunal found no fundamental breach of contract by the respondent and no causal link between any protected disclosures and the alleged detriments.
Employer: Honeybee People Ltd (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation)
The claimant succeeded on claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay, notice pay, and expenses but the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed due to lack of two years' qualifying service.
Employer: Moneyplus Group Ltd
The claimant failed to demonstrate a pretty good chance of success at the final hearing, as required for interim relief; the application was therefore refused.
Employer: YHG Ltd
The Tribunal ruled that the Claimant was an employee and a worker for the duration of his engagement.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.