Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Manchester.
£282,098.49 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: E3 Associates Ltd
The claim for unlawful deduction from wages was found well founded because the respondent failed to attend and the judge accepted the claimant's evidence.
Reference: 6047426/2025
Employer: Big Help Group Ltd
Respondent failed to present a valid response; judgment made in claimant's favour for breach of contract, redundancy, and unpaid holiday pay.
Reference: 6026544/2025
Employer: Lake District Hotels Ltd
The respondent was not entitled to require the claimant to take annual leave during his notice period without giving the statutory notice under Regulation 15, and the contractual clause did not displace that requirement.
Reference: 6039450/2025
Employer: Hastings Insurance Services Ltd
Both complaints of unfair constructive dismissal and disability discrimination were dismissed as not well-founded.
Reference: 6004402/2025
Employer: Pure Spa and Beauty Ltd
The respondent agreed by consent to pay the claimant a redundancy payment and holiday pay, resulting in a total award of £960.96.
Reference: 6019794/2025
Employer: I & S Transport Ltd
The claimant failed to attend the final hearing without reason or notification, so the claim was dismissed under rule 47.
Reference: 6001308/2026
Employer: The Commissioners for HM’s Revenue and Customs
The tribunal found that the respondent did not discriminate against the claimant on grounds of disability; the manager's actions were reasonable and not linked to the claimant's disability, and no harassment or victimisation occurred.
Reference: 2402065/2024
Employer: Clean Event Services Ltd
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the final hearing without explanation, and the tribunal considered it appropriate to dismiss under rule 47.
Reference: 6042181/2025
Employer: The Festive Decorators (UK) Ltd and Mr P Lally
Claimant won on unpaid wages claim but lost on harassment claim.
Reference: 2402542/2024
Employer: Hollin Primary School and Rochdale Borough Council
The Tribunal found that the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal was well-founded and that she was unfairly dismissed, resulting in an award of £62,470.73.
Reference: 6007168/2024
Employer: Performance Doorset Solutions Ltd
The complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
Reference: 6004149/2025
Employer: Kendal Vets4Pets Ltd
The complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded; the claimant was not unfairly dismissed.
Reference: 6010696/2025
Employer: Greggs plc
All claims were dismissed: the dismissal was fair, the alleged discriminatory comment was not made, and the employer did not have the requisite knowledge of the claimant's disability to trigger the duty to make reasonable adjustments.
Reference: 2401528/2024
Employer: F Duerr and Sons Ltd
The claimant's complaints of direct discrimination based on race and disability failed and were dismissed at the final hearing.
Reference: 6016622/2024
Employer: MV Essentials Ltd
The claimant succeeded in all three claims for statutory redundancy payment, unpaid holiday pay, and notice pay, with the tribunal ordering the respondent to pay a total of £4,218.93.
Reference: 6032367/2025
Employer: Simpsons Skoda
Both claims were struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success.
Reference: 2402400/2025
Employer: Francomes Building Timber and Landscaping Supplies
The claimant failed to prove she was a disabled person under the Equality Act 2010, and the dismissal was not because of anything arising from a disability.
Reference: 2400679/2024
Employer: Phase 2 Growth Ltd (No defence filed)
The claimant succeeded on the unlawful deductions from wages claim but the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed for lack of service, and the disability discrimination claim was not resolved.
Reference: 6027929/2025
Employer: Peninsula Business Services Ltd
The claim was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of being found to have been presented in time or of a reasonable-practicability extension.
Reference: 6041358/2025
Employer: Asda Stores Ltd
The claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with Tribunal Rules or a Tribunal order.
Reference: 6012276/2025
Employer: Greater Manchester Combined Authority
The claimant succeeded on all main claims including constructive unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, harassment, victimisation, and partially on sex discrimination and reasonable adjustments.
Reference: 2400729/2024
Employer: Goliath Marketing Ltd
The claimant won his wrongful dismissal claim for notice pay but lost his other breach of contract and unlawful deductions claims.
Reference: 6035984/2025
Employer: Sky Bear Pubs Ltd
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in May 2025, and the claim was well-founded.
Reference: 6027889/2025
Employer: Intrum UK Ltd
The claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed because the employer's conduct (office relocation) breached the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, entitling her to redundancy payments.
Reference: 2407201/2024
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.