27 Jul 2026
Claim dismissed
Other
Heard at Croydon
The claimant was not an employee or worker because she had a genuine right to substitute, was not subject to sufficient control, and was operating her own business.
Legal Issues (5)
- Whether the claimant was an employee or worker under s.230 ERA 1996
- whether there was an obligation of personal service
- whether the right to substitute was genuine
- whether the respondents exercised control
- whether the claimant was in business on her own account
Reference: 2306620/2024