Bidvest Noonan (UK) Ltd employment tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Bidvest Noonan (UK) Ltd.

Cases (last 2 years): 10
Tribunal locations (last 2 years): 3
Recorded awards (last 2 years): 2

Published decisions

Five most recent decisions

Newest decisions first

9 Jul 2026

Mixed outcome£20,831.88 awarded

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Unpaid Wages, Breach of Contract and Other

Heard at Leeds

The claimant succeeded on constructive unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and holiday pay claims but lost on discrimination and part-time worker allegations, resulting in a split overall outcome.

Legal Issues (5)

Constructive unfair dismissal
wrongful dismissal (breach of contract)
unpaid holiday pay (wages)
discrimination under the Equality Act
Part Time Workers Regulations. The tribunal applied the ACAS Code of Practice regarding uplift for unreasonable failure to comply

Reference: 1808812/2024

12 Jan 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal

Heard at London Central

The claim was dismissed because the Tribunal concluded it was filed out of time and that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have lodged it within the three‑month limit.

Legal Issues (3)

Whether the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was filed within the three‑month limitation period or
if late
whether it was reasonably practicable for him to bring the claim earlier given his disability and lack of knowledge of time limits

Reference: 2200567/2025

5 Nov 2025

Claimant won£1,181.06 awarded

Unpaid Wages

Heard at London Central

The tribunal found the holiday‑pay claim well‑founded and ordered the employer to pay the unpaid holiday pay of £1,181.06.

Legal Issues (3)

Whether the employer lawfully deducted holiday pay
the employee’s entitlement to paid annual leave under the Working Time Regulations
the calculation of the correct holiday pay amount

Reference: 6020043/2025

16 Oct 2025

Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal

Heard at London Central

The claim was dismissed because it was filed after the statutory three‑month limit and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have lodged it within that period.

Legal Issues (6)

Whether the claim was out of time under s.111(2) ERA 1996
the meaning of “reasonably practicable” for extending the three‑month limitation period
whether the claimant’s personal circumstances
dyslexia
representation issues could justify an extension
the applicability of the tribunal’s power to strike out a claim at a preliminary hearing

Reference: 6005538/2025

22 Aug 2025

Claim dismissed

Discrimination, Unpaid Wages and Harassment

Heard at London Central

The claimant's claims of disability discrimination and unlawful deductions from wages were dismissed as not well-founded.

Legal Issues (5)

Disability discrimination (s.15 EqA)
failure to make reasonable adjustments
harassment
victimisation
unlawful deductions from wages

Reference: 6005759/2024

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.