Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London East.
£100,243.43 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd
The claimant failed to comply with tribunal orders and did not attend the hearing, leading to strikeout of the entire claim.
Reference: 6017080/2025
Employer: Sansum Solutions Group Ltd
The complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract (dismissal without notice) succeeded; the holiday pay claim was withdrawn after payment.
Reference: 6025878/2025
Employer: Leidos Industrial Engineers Ltd
The claimant won his constructive unfair dismissal claim because the respondent's flawed disciplinary process, trumped-up charges, and unfair final written warning cumulatively breached the implied term of trust and confidence, but lost his whistleblowing claims because the protected disclosure did not materially influence the respondent's actions.
Reference: 3205717/2022
Employer: Property Partners Management Ltd
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the hearing without a satisfactory explanation, and his non-attendance was found to be deliberate and contumelious.
Reference: 6031650/2025
Employer: My Lahore Birmingham Ltd and AF Restaurants Ltd
All claims were struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success or the claimants failed to comply with orders to properly particularise their claims.
Reference: 3205774/2022
Employer: Pinnacle Finance and Property Group Ltd
The claim for unauthorised deductions was well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay the deducted sums.
Reference: 6030428/2025
Employer: London Borough of Newham
The claim was struck out because there was no reasonable prospect of success; the dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses given the repeated security breaches and a live final written warning.
Reference: 6003348/2024
Employer: Care Premium Ltd
The claimant succeeded in proving that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and failed to pay holiday pay, and the claim was allowed despite being out of time due to reasonable practicability.
Reference: 3201472/2024
Employer: Silverman Opticians Ltd
Claimant won on victimisation (bonus withdrawal) and section 38 claim but lost on direct discrimination, harassment and unfair dismissal.
Reference: 3200344/2023
Employer: Royal Mail Group Ltd
The claimant succeeded on three harassment claims but lost all other claims, including constructive unfair dismissal and most reasonable adjustment and discrimination complaints.
Reference: 3204647/2022
Employer: Aecom Ltd
The claim was dismissed on remission because the Tribunal found the claimant was not a genuine applicant for the role.
Reference: 3202234/2018
Employer: PP Management Ltd
The claimant did not attend the hearing and failed to provide a witness statement, leading to dismissal under Rule 47.
Reference: 6007585/2026
Employer: Lola’s Cupcakes Ltd and Mr A Budwig
All claims were dismissed or withdrawn, resulting in no award.
Reference: 3201953/2023
Employer: Choices Healthcare Ltd
The claimant succeeded in unfair dismissal and wages claims but discrimination claims were dismissed.
Reference: 3200277/2024
Employer: Moreton Church of England Primary School
The complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Reference: 6023286/2025
Employer: Richan Care Ltd
The claimant failed to prove it was not reasonably practicable to present his claim within the statutory time limit, and even if it were, he did not present it within a reasonable period thereafter, so the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.
Reference: 6033591/2025
Employer: London Ambulance Service NHS Trust
All discrimination complaints were dismissed because the reduction in shifts was due to the introduction of a new shift allocation system (Rotamaster) and not because of any protected characteristic; the Respondent provided a compelling non-discriminatory explanation.
Reference: 3200347/2025
Employer: Young & Co’s Brewery plc
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the final hearing without good reason and did not comply with tribunal orders.
Reference: 6005766/2024
Employer: Mr Cosmetics Ltd
The respondent dismissed the claimant without any investigation, without putting allegations to her, and without following a fair process, making the dismissal unfair and wrongful.
Reference: 6007218/2024
Employer: Southend on Sea City Council
All claims dismissed as not well-founded; pre-January 2023 allegations also out of time.
Reference: 3201126/2024
Employer: The Campaign for Drawing (T/a The Big Draw) and others
The claimant failed to establish that the disclosures were protected or that the principal reason for dismissal was the protected disclosure rather than genuine redundancy.
Reference: 3201306/2024
Employer: E11 Backstage Studio Ltd
The claimant succeeded in her claims for National Minimum Wage (idle time), holiday pay, and the statutory additional award for failure to provide a written statement.
Reference: 3200341/2025
Employer: Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd
The claimant failed to attend the hearing and provided no reason for absence, leading to dismissal of all claims.
Reference: 6016036/2025
Employer: Hooky St Coffee Co Ltd
The claimant succeeded in claims for unauthorised deductions, notice pay, and written particulars, but the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction due to insufficient continuous employment.
Reference: 6033315/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.