DPD Group UK Ltd employment tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving DPD Group UK Ltd.

Cases (last 2 years)
7
Tribunal locations (last 2 years)
4
Recorded awards (last 2 years)
2

£13,022.84 combined

Published decisions

Five most recent decisions

Newest decisions first

2 Aug 2026
Dismissed on jurisdiction

Whistleblowing and Breach of Contract

Heard at London East

The Tribunal found that the claimant was a self-employed franchisee, not an employee or worker, and therefore had no jurisdiction to hear the claims; the entire case was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.

Legal Issues (6)
  • Determination of employment status under s.230(1) ERA 1996 (employee) and s.230(3)(b) (worker)
  • definition of employee under s.83(2)(a) EA 2010
  • requirement for personal service
  • effect of substitution clauses
  • conditional offer of employment and whether a binding contract was formed
  • application of Autoclenz and Pimlico Plumbers principles

Reference: 3201090/2024

17 Feb 2026
Claimant won

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

Heard at Midlands West

The tribunal concluded that the employer’s policies were indirectly discriminatory on grounds of sex and that the dismissal was unfair, so the claimant’s claims were upheld.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Indirect sex discrimination under s 39 Equality Act 2010
  • failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability (found not to breach)
  • unfair dismissal under s 94 Employment Rights Act 1996

Reference: 1306383/2024

29 Dec 2025
Dismissed on jurisdiction

Discrimination and Harassment

Heard at Birmingham

The claimant failed to establish that he met the statutory definition of a disabled person at the relevant times for the purpose of his claims.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Whether the claimant was disabled under s.6 Equality Act 2010
  • requirement for medical evidence of long-term
  • substantial adverse effect
  • credibility of claimant's self-reported symptoms

Reference: 1300257/2025

23 Oct 2025
Claim dismissed

Discrimination and Whistleblowing

Dismissed because the employer had provided reasonable adjustments and complied with grievance and health‑and‑safety procedures, so the claimant’s discrimination and detriment claims were not proven.

Legal Issues (6)
  • Whether the claimant was a disabled person (found yes)
  • whether the employer failed to make reasonable adjustments
  • whether there was direct discrimination
  • discrimination arising from disability
  • victimisation for making protected disclosures
  • whether the grievance and whistleblowing processes were handled lawfully

Reference: 8001930/2024

3 Oct 2025
Claim dismissed

Unpaid Wages and Breach of Contract

Heard at Leicester

The claim was dismissed because the bonus was discretionary, there was no contractual right to it, and the employer reasonably exercised its discretion to withhold the payment while the employee was under suspension and later dismissed.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Whether the MIP bonus formed a contractual entitlement
  • whether the employer’s refusal to pay amounted to an unauthorised deduction of wages
  • whether the employer exercised its contractual discretion arbitrarily
  • capriciously or unreasonably
  • interpretation of the employment contract and the MIPP policy

Reference: 6023339/2025

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.