Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Leicester.
£72,311.76 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Prime Life Ltd
The claimant succeeded on her claim of constructive unfair dismissal but failed on her claims of direct age discrimination and unpaid holiday pay.
Reference: 2602043/2024
Employer: Optima UK Inc Ltd
The Tribunal found the holiday pay claim well-founded and awarded compensation.
Reference: 6008608/2026
Employer: Paul S Winson (Coaches) Ltd
The claimant succeeded on all his claims for unlawful deduction of wages, unpaid holiday pay, and constructive dismissal, and the respondent's counterclaim was dismissed.
Reference: 6008108/2026
Employer: Imperial Stampings Ltd
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed as not well-founded.
Reference: 6026090/2025
Employer: Mr D Carlin
The tribunal found the claimant was an employee, was dismissed by reason of redundancy, and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,354.56, and also found unlawful deductions from wages and failure to pay holiday pay, with amounts to be determined.
Reference: 6003696/2026
Employer: Hastings Insurance Services Ltd
All claims were dismissed under Rule 47 due to the claimant's non-attendance at the preliminary hearing and failure to comply with orders.
Reference: 6041808/2025
Employer: C4L1BRATE Ltd
The claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay compensation.
Reference: 6001293/2026
Employer: Ashfields Restaurants (Earl Shilton) Ltd
The claimant succeeded on a technical breach of the right to itemised pay statements but obtained no compensation; all other claims were dismissed or withdrawn.
Reference: 2600161/2026
Employer: Ibstock Parish Council
The tribunal found that the claimant was constructively and unfairly dismissed and awarded compensation.
Reference: 6013439/2025
Employer: Holland and Barrett Retail Ltd
The whistleblowing detriment claim was withdrawn and the deposit order application on the unfair dismissal claim was refused, leaving the unfair dismissal claim undetermined.
Reference: 6030892/2025
Employer: Sue Davis Ltd T/a Sue Davis Hair & Beauty
The claimant succeeded because the respondent did not provide itemised pay statements and did not pay holiday pay due on termination.
Reference: 2600826/2025
Employer: Group 12 Ltd
The wages claim succeeded with an award of £4,783.76, while the holiday pay claim was dismissed on the merits.
Reference: 6044543/2025
Employer: Samy (County) Ltd
The tribunal found the claimant was constructively and unfairly dismissed and that the respondent made unlawful deductions from her wages.
Reference: 6027029/2025
Employer: AB Autocare Ltd
The claim was dismissed because it was not presented within the statutory time limit and it was reasonably practicable to have presented it in time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
Reference: 6003663/2026
Employer: Xplore UK Distribution Ltd
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars, resulting in awards of £1,875 and £1,800 respectively.
Reference: 6045692/2025
Employer: The Governing Body of Catherine Junior School and Leicester City Council
The constructive unfair dismissal claim was presented out of time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it, and the application to amend was dismissed.
Reference: 6025089/2025
Employer: Green - Wood by Design Ltd
The claimant won on wages and breach of contract claims via default judgment but lost all remaining complaints when she failed to attend the remedy hearing.
Reference: 2601172/2025
Employer: White Rose Trading CIC
The claimant's complaints of automatic unfair dismissal (whistleblowing) and unlawful deduction of wages were struck out for having no reasonable prospects, while race discrimination and harassment claims were allowed to proceed.
Reference: 6016878/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.