Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Birmingham.
£42,437.36 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Tamworth Borough Council
All complaints were found not well-founded and dismissed.
Reference: 6021283/2024
Employer: R Rahman
The claim was well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay the sum claimed for unpaid wages.
Reference: 6009027/2024
Employer: Jaguar Land Rover Ltd
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well founded, and the respondent's justification defence succeeded in respect of the discrimination claim, leading to dismissal of all claims.
Reference: 1306036/2024
Employer: University of Wolverhampton
The complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and therefore dismissed.
Reference: 6030814/2025
Employer: Birmingham City Council
The claimants failed to show their work as Business Advisers was like work to that of Account Managers – the roles were materially different in content, responsibility and time allocation.
Reference: 1304212/2024
Employer: People Solutions Ltd
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of two years' service, and his discrimination claims were struck out because the respondent could not be held liable for the alleged acts of Autosmart employees; a holiday pay claim remains pending.
Reference: 6004258/2025
Employer: Elements Europe Ltd (in Administration) and Secretary of State for Business & Trade
The employer failed to conduct any collective consultation before dismissing 141 employees for redundancy, breaching section 188 TULCRA.
Reference: 1304080/2025
Employer: Secretary State
The claimant succeeded in having commission included in the calculation of redundancy and notice pay, but failed on her claim for arrears of commission.
Reference: 6012517/2025
Employer: HI Q Windows Ltd
The claimant succeeded on all three substantive complaints (unauthorised deductions, breach of contract for notice pay, and unfair dismissal) with the respondent ordered to pay compensation including ACAS uplifts.
Reference: 1303312/2024
Employer: UK Fuels Ltd
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of the required two years' service, and all other discrimination claims were dismissed as not well founded.
Reference: 1303342/2024
Employer: Circle Health Group Ltd
Claimant won unfair dismissal but lost other claims; compensation limited to basic award due to Polkey reduction.
Reference: 1306301/2024
Employer: A Moseley
The claimant succeeded in unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims but lost on holiday pay and withdrew age discrimination.
Reference: 1306018/2024
Employer: Cargo Marketing Services Ltd
The disability discrimination claims were found to be unfounded and dismissed.
Reference: 6002570/2025
Employer: Dr N Latif and Others
All complaints of sex discrimination, harassment, and victimisation were dismissed as not well-founded.
Reference: 6017057/2024
Employer: Matrix Academy Trust
The claimant's manner of conducting proceedings was scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious, making a fair trial impossible, and strike out was the proportionate sanction.
Reference: 1306130/2024
Employer: T07558385 Ltd, formerly ‘Advanced Services (West Midlands) Ltd’
The respondent failed to file a response, and the tribunal determined the claim in the claimant's favour under Rule 22, awarding compensation for unpaid wages, notice pay, redundancy, and holiday pay.
Reference: 6024937/2025
Employer: Bosch Thermotechnology Ltd
All complaints were dismissed because the claimant was not a disabled person at the relevant times and the claims were not well-founded.
Reference: 1311291/2024
Employer: Ridgwoodetti Ltd
The respondent did not contest the claim and the tribunal found the deduction was unlawful.
Reference: 6003061/2026
Employer: Avonline Logistics Ltd
The claim was struck out because the claimant did not attend the hearing and had not actively pursued the proceedings.
Reference: 6025508/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.