WorkDisputes Logo

Jaguar Land Rover Ltd employment tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Jaguar Land Rover Ltd.

Cases (last 5 years)
13
Tribunal locations (last 5 years)
3
Recorded awards (last 5 years)
1

£5,852.59 combined

Published decisions

Five most recent decisions

Newest decisions first

28 Sept 2026
Claim dismissed

Whistleblowing

Heard at Birmingham

The claim of detriment for making protected disclosures was dismissed in its entirety after the tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure and, in any event, the alleged detriments were not on the ground of any disclosure.

Legal Issues (6)
  • Whether the claimant made qualifying disclosures under s.43B ERA
  • whether any such disclosures were protected under ss.43C-43H ERA
  • whether the claimant was subjected to detriments (investigation meeting, suspension, termination, alleged blacklisting, letters) under s.47B ERA
  • whether any detriment was on the ground of protected disclosures. The tribunal found no protected disclosure was made
  • even if it had been
  • the detriments were not on that ground

Reference: 6015547/2024

14 Aug 2026
Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

Heard at Birmingham

The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well founded, and the respondent's justification defence succeeded in respect of the discrimination claim, leading to dismissal of all claims.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Unfair dismissal
  • disability discrimination (section 15 Equality Act 2010)
  • justification defence
  • burden of proof

Reference: 1306036/2024

25 Jan 2026
Claim dismissed

Discrimination and Whistleblowing

Heard at Birmingham

All of the claimant’s complaints were dismissed as an abuse of process or barred by res judicata, leaving only limited whistleblowing complaints subject to deposit orders.

Legal Issues (6)
  • Res judicata/issue estoppel
  • Henderson v Henderson abuse of process
  • whistleblowing protection
  • race discrimination
  • victimisation
  • deposit orders under the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024

Reference: 6002076/2025

3 Sept 2025
Dismissed on jurisdiction

Unfair Dismissal

Heard at Manchester

The claim was filed out of time and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for it to have been filed within the limit, so no extension was granted and the tribunal lacked jurisdiction.

Legal Issues (2)
  • Whether the statutory time limit for bringing an unfair dismissal claim could be extended under s111 ERA 1996
  • whether the tribunal retained jurisdiction to hear the claim

Reference: 6012807/2024

19 Aug 2025
Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Whistleblowing

Heard at Birmingham

The tribunal dismissed all of Curtis’s claims, finding the dismissal was for a substantial reason (remand in custody) and the employer acted reasonably, and the victimisation and protected‑disclosure claims were either out of time or unsupported.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Whether the dismissal was automatically unfair because it was for a protected disclosure
  • whether the employer had a substantial
  • potentially fair reason (remand in custody or conduct/capability) and acted reasonably
  • whether the victimisation and detriment claims were within the statutory time limits and were supported by evidence
  • whether the claimant’s protected disclosures qualified under the ERA

Reference: 1301486/2022

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.