Jaguar Land Rover Ltd employment tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Jaguar Land Rover Ltd.

Cases (last 2 years): 11
Tribunal locations (last 2 years): 3
Recorded awards (last 2 years): 0

Published decisions

Five most recent decisions

Newest decisions first

14 Aug 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

Heard at Birmingham

The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well founded, and the respondent's justification defence succeeded in respect of the discrimination claim, leading to dismissal of all claims.

Legal Issues (4)

Unfair dismissal
disability discrimination (section 15 Equality Act 2010)
justification defence
burden of proof

Reference: 1306036/2024

25 Jan 2026

Claim dismissed

Discrimination and Whistleblowing

Heard at Birmingham

All of the claimant’s complaints were dismissed as an abuse of process or barred by res judicata, leaving only limited whistleblowing complaints subject to deposit orders.

Legal Issues (6)

Res judicata/issue estoppel
Henderson v Henderson abuse of process
whistleblowing protection
race discrimination
victimisation
deposit orders under the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024

Reference: 6002076/2025

3 Sept 2025

Dismissed on jurisdiction

Unfair Dismissal

Heard at Manchester

The claim was filed out of time and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for it to have been filed within the limit, so no extension was granted and the tribunal lacked jurisdiction.

Legal Issues (2)

Whether the statutory time limit for bringing an unfair dismissal claim could be extended under s111 ERA 1996
whether the tribunal retained jurisdiction to hear the claim

Reference: 6012807/2024

19 Aug 2025

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Whistleblowing

Heard at Birmingham

The tribunal dismissed all of Curtis’s claims, finding the dismissal was for a substantial reason (remand in custody) and the employer acted reasonably, and the victimisation and protected‑disclosure claims were either out of time or unsupported.

Legal Issues (5)

Whether the dismissal was automatically unfair because it was for a protected disclosure
whether the employer had a substantial
potentially fair reason (remand in custody or conduct/capability) and acted reasonably
whether the victimisation and detriment claims were within the statutory time limits and were supported by evidence
whether the claimant’s protected disclosures qualified under the ERA

Reference: 1301486/2022

31 Mar 2025

Mixed outcome

Discrimination and Harassment

Heard at Birmingham

The claimant won on two specific discrimination claims (direct race discrimination and victimisation) but lost on all other claims, and a remedies hearing is still pending.

Legal Issues (8)

Direct race discrimination (s.13 EqA 2010)
victimisation (s.27 EqA 2010)
direct sex and age discrimination
harassment (s.26 EqA 2010)
post-termination discrimination (s.108 EqA 2010)
time limits (s.123 EqA 2010)
sham recruitment process
burden of proof

Reference: 1300105/2023

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.