Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Cambridge.
£7,223.77 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: DHL Services Ltd
The claims were dismissed because the tribunal found no fundamental breach of contract by the respondent and no protected disclosures had been made, with the claimant's evidence being unreliable and the respondent's actions justified.
Employer: Business Management Software Ltd and Automatic Data Processing Ltd
The claim was dismissed because the claimant voluntarily withdrew it on the eve of the final hearing, and the tribunal concluded that dismissal was in the interests of justice to prevent abuse of process.
Employer: Norfolk County Council
All claims were dismissed or struck out because they were presented out of time or the claimant lacked the required two years' service.
The claimant succeeded in obtaining a protective award due to the respondents' failure to consult over collective redundancies, but her other claims were dismissed or struck out for non-compliance and lack of pursuit.
Employer: Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Both claims were dismissed because they were presented outside the primary limitation period and the claimant did not satisfy the tribunal that an extension of time should be granted.
Employer: T.A.P (March) Ltd
Claim dismissed due to claimant's non-attendance at hearing under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Employer: FMH Conveyors International Ltd
The application for interim relief was dismissed because it was presented after the seven-day statutory time limit had expired, and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to extend that limit.
Employer: Brookwood Temporary Solutions Ltd
The Tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and breached its statutory duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars.
Employer: AT Transport Solutions Ltd
The respondent failed to show a potentially fair reason for dismissal and the dismissal was procedurally and substantively unfair; additionally, the claimant was disabled and suffered discrimination arising from her disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and harassment.
Employer: Tempest Rentals (Stickly) Ltd
The Tribunal found that the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages and ordered repayment.
Employer: Hazeldene Medical Center Ltd
The Tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims for constructive unfair dismissal and notice pay.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.