Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Cambridge.
£3,982.40 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Secretary of State for Business and Trade
The claimant was not an employee within the meaning of s.230 ERA 1996, so all claims failed and were dismissed.
Reference: 6028208/2025
Employer: Secretary of State for Business and Trade
All claims were dismissed because the claimant was not an employee within the meaning of s.230 ERA 1996.
Reference: 6028211/2025
Employer: Bank of Baroda UK Ltd
The tribunal found that the ESA was expressly incorporated into the claimants' contracts through the reference to the RPA in their appointment letters, and that the ESA's enhanced redundancy pay clause (4 weeks per year of service) was a contractual entitlement.
Reference: 3306622/2024
Employer: North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust
The complaint of direct disability discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Reference: 3311470/2024
Employer: Norfolk County Council
The claimant's claims were dismissed or struck out because they were out of time or because the claimant lacked the required two years' continuous service.
Reference: 6012287/2025
Employer: Festimed Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)
All claims struck out because the respondent company was dissolved, leaving the tribunal without jurisdiction.
Reference: 6001452/2025
Employer: Racesafe Ltd and others
The claims were dismissed because the first respondent lacked actual or constructive knowledge of the claimant's disability, the third respondent did not terminate her employment, and the reasonable adjustments claim failed as the offered adjustments were reasonable.
Reference: 3320575/2021
Employer: Coffee Xpress (Bedford) Ltd
The complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and the claim was dismissed.
Reference: 6006526/2025
Employer: Santander plc
All claims were struck out as they had no reasonable prospects of success.
Reference: 3303710/2025
Employer: Kettonby Care Ltd
The claim was dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit, and it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have done so.
Reference: 6013990/2025
Employer: The Salvation Army Trustee Company
The complaint of unfair dismissal was found well-founded, but remedy has not yet been determined, and no compensation award has been made.
Reference: 3302568/2025
Employer: BCA Logistics Ltd
The claimant succeeded on her reasonable adjustment claims in respect of two PCPs and on her s.15 and s.26 claims regarding Issue 5, but failed on all other discrimination claims and the unlawful deductions/holiday pay claims, with one harassment claim dismissed as out of time.
Reference: 3312261/2023
Employer: Bulldog Offshore Services Ltd (in liquidation)
The claim for unlawful deduction of wages succeeded.
Reference: 6006161/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.