Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Watford.
£19,668.13 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: London Fire Commissioner
The complaint was dismissed because it was presented after the time limit and it was reasonably practicable to have presented it in time.
Employer: Hertfordshire County Council
The claimant succeeded in her claim for disability discrimination due to the respondent's failure to make reasonable adjustments.
Employer: St Bartholomew’s School
The tribunal found the dismissal unfair because the investigation was flawed (unbalanced, prejudged, incomplete) and the sanction of dismissal fell outside the range of reasonable responses.
Employer: G1 Design Ltd
The claimant succeeded on all claims: unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions, breach of contract, and holiday pay.
Employer: O’Loughlin Commercials Ltd
The tribunal found that the dismissal was not unfair, because the employer's conduct (including the lack of procedure) fell within the range of reasonable responses, or that any procedural steps would have been futile.
Employer: Mayfords Estate Agents Ltd
The employer was entitled under the contract to vary the disciplinary procedure for short service, so there was no breach of contract.
Employer: Caerus Lifecare Ltd
The claimant succeeded in her claims for unauthorised deductions from pay and redundancy payment, but withdrew her claims for unfair dismissal and holiday pay.
Employer: Kanki Turkish Meze and Cocktail Bar Ltd
The claim was dismissed under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not properly pursue a postponement, leading the Judge to conclude he was not intent on pursuing his claims.
Employer: IAG Cargo Ltd
The judgment is solely a costs order; the substantive outcome of the underlying claim is not stated.
Employer: Angard Staffing Solutions Ltd
The claims were not well-founded and were dismissed.
Employer: BFT Mastclimbing Ltd
The claimant succeeded on liability as the tribunal found he was dismissed because of his protected disclosures, making the dismissal automatically unfair, and further that any redundancy process was unfair.
Employer: Itarmi UK Ltd
The claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed, but the respondent was found to have made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's pay (with the amount to be confirmed).
Employer: Tesco Stores Ltd
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal.
Employer: The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge and Others
The claims against the second, third, and fifth respondents were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success, while the remaining claims against the first respondent continue to a final hearing.
Employer: Butchers Pet Care Ltd
The Tribunal found that the claims for automatic unfair dismissal and pregnancy discrimination did not succeed.
Employer: Travis Perkins Trading Company Ltd
The complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded, so the claimant won, but with a 25% reduction applied to the awards.
Employer: Brunel University of London
The claimant's claims of direct religious discrimination, direct discrimination in shortlisting, and victimisation were all dismissed as not well-founded.
Employer: West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Others
The claims were struck out because the settlement agreement barred claims arising before 11 June 2024, the claim against Dr Halpin had no reasonable prospect of success due to lack of employment relationship, and the remaining claims were out of time or had no reasonable prospect of success.
The respondent failed to present a valid response, so the Tribunal entered judgment in favour of the claimants for unpaid wages and/or notice pay.
Employer: Tesco Stores Ltd
The Tribunal found that the claimant was not dismissed by the respondent, either under the statutory definition or otherwise.
Employer: Innovate Transport UK Ltd
The Tribunal found the claimant was a sub-contractor rather than a worker and that the respondent had correctly paid him based on the agreed drop rate.
Employer: Priory Central Services Ltd
The claimant succeeded on some direct disability discrimination claims but failed on others and on all harassment claims, while earlier claims were withdrawn.
Employer: British Airways plc
The Tribunal found that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded.
Employer: Mitie Ltd
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.