Employment Tribunal decisions and outcome patterns in the Transport & Logistics sector from the last 12 months.
Final Transport & Logistics decisions with at least one determined claim.
Proportion of cases won or split/upheld in our database.
Cases lost or struck out due to procedural/jurisdictional issues.
Showing 28 cases from the last 2 months.
Browse the latest published decisions for employers represented in this sector sample.
The claimant's long-term absence and inability to provide a return date made dismissal fair; discrimination claims failed on merits or were out of time.
Reference: 3304745/2024
All claims were presented significantly out of time (9 months) and the claimant failed to demonstrate it was not reasonably practicable or just and equitable to extend time.
Reference: 6017310/2025
The claimant resigned voluntarily and was not dismissed by the respondent; the resignation was a consensual decision to avoid a potential capability dismissal.
Reference: 6007709/2024
The claimant won on constructive unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions, and breach of contract, but lost on race discrimination and whistleblowing claims.
Reference: 3312501/2023
The claimant lost the unfair dismissal claim due to insufficient qualifying period, but won a breach of contract claim for notice pay and partially succeeded on the wages claim for failure to provide pay statements.
Reference: 6012692/2025
Claimant had less than two years' service and therefore lacked jurisdiction to bring an unfair dismissal claim.
Reference: 6048436/2025
Discrimination arising from disability claim succeeded because respondent failed to justify dismissal as proportionate; other claims dismissed or withdrawn.
Reference: 6008017/2024
The employer had a genuine belief in the claimant's misconduct based on reasonable grounds and a reasonable investigation, and the decision to dismiss was within the range of reasonable responses, such that the dismissal was fair.
Reference: 6034850/2025
The claimant's application for reconsideration was refused because there was no reasonable prospect of the original strike-out decision being varied or revoked.
Reference: 2602006/2024
All claims were dismissed: unfair dismissal was struck out for lack of service, and the discrimination and harassment claims failed because the Tribunal found the respondent's conduct was not unwanted, not related to disability, and did not have the proscribed purpose or effect.
Reference: 6020012/2025
The employer failed to consult collectively over redundancies, so a protective award of 90 days' pay was made.
Reference: 6011646/2024
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars, resulting in awards of £1,875 and £1,800 respectively.
Reference: 6045692/2025
Claimant succeeded in unfair dismissal and reasonable adjustments claims but failed in direct discrimination claim.
Reference: 6014087/2025
The tribunal dismissed all disability discrimination claims because the evidence did not establish that the claimant was placed at a substantial disadvantage by any PCP, nor that the treatment complained of was unfavourable because of something arising in consequence of her disability.
Reference: 6005622/2024
Claimant's claims dismissed because the respondent lawfully recovered overpayment for days the claimant worked elsewhere without consent.
Reference: 6041642/2025
The claimant's complaints of sexual harassment and victimisation were dismissed by the Tribunal.
Reference: 6000822/2025
Some claims were struck out (age discrimination, age harassment, parts of victimisation) and some amendments refused, while other claims continue to final hearing.
Reference: 3312696/2023
The tribunal found that the employer failed to consult under TULRCA, unfairly dismissed some employees for redundancy, made unlawful deductions from wages, and breached contract for notice pay, while other claims were withdrawn or struck out, and some remain undetermined for a separate list of claimants.
Reference: 3302830/2025
The claimant was not an employee of the respondent, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed and the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction for the other claims.
Reference: 2301731/2025
The claimant succeeded on three harassment claims but lost all other claims, including constructive unfair dismissal and most reasonable adjustment and discrimination complaints.
Reference: 3204647/2022
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the preliminary hearing and did not respond to attempts to contact her, indicating she had decided not to pursue her claim.
Reference: 3312555/2023
The claimant's claim was dismissed after he failed to attend a preliminary hearing, and the Tribunal refused to reconsider that dismissal because it was not in the interests of justice to do so.
Reference: 1402239/2024
The claimant succeeded only on one of several reasonable adjustment complaints; all other claims were dismissed.
Reference: 3305178/2023
The claimant's claim of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Reference: 2407242/2023
The claim for holiday pay was well-founded and the respondent ordered to pay £2,660.
Reference: 3311359/2024
The disability discrimination claims were found to be unfounded and dismissed.
Reference: 6002570/2025
The claims of unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, and whistleblowing were dismissed for want of jurisdiction as they were presented out of time and the claimant failed to establish valid presentation or grounds for an extension.
Reference: 3311709/2024
All claims were dismissed as either not well founded on the facts or brought out of time.
Reference: 2600012/2026
Decisions are sourced from official GOV.UK Employment Tribunal publications.
Important: Summaries and statistics are automated. Always verify against the original decision documents.