Cygnet (DH) Ltd employment tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Cygnet (DH) Ltd.

Cases (last 5 years)
3
Tribunal locations (last 5 years)
2
Recorded awards (last 5 years)
1

£8,345.25 combined

Published decisions

Five most recent decisions

Newest decisions first

27 Jul 2026
Claim struck out

Discrimination, Whistleblowing and Breach of Contract

Heard at Dundee

All claims were dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the preliminary hearing, did not provide a reasonable explanation, and had not actively pursued her complaints.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Dismissal under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 for non-attendance and failure to pursue claims
  • overriding objective
  • procedural fairness

Reference: 8000614/2026

5 Dec 2024
Claimant won

Unfair Dismissal

Heard at Middlesbrough

The dismissal was procedurally unfair due to the respondent's unreasonable delay in investigating the misconduct, even though the substantive decision to dismiss was within the range of reasonable responses.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Unfair dismissal – reasonableness of investigation
  • delay
  • Polkey reduction
  • range of reasonable responses
  • ACAS Code of Practice

Reference: 2501667/2024

29 Apr 2024
Mixed outcome£8,345.25 awarded

Unfair Dismissal, Whistleblowing and Other

Heard at Dundee

The claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim succeeded; the whistleblowing claim was withdrawn; and the Working Time Regulations claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Legal Issues (9)
  • Constructive dismissal
  • unfair dismissal (section 98 ERA)
  • protected disclosures (sections 47B and 103A)
  • Working Time Regulations jurisdiction
  • time limits
  • contributory fault
  • mitigation of loss
  • ACAS Code of Practice adjustments
  • expenses for abortive hearing

Reference: 4101861/2023

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.