Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination
Heard at Watford
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not press his claim, leading the judge to conclude it was in the interests of justice to dismiss under rule 47.
Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving London Underground Ltd.
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Heard at Watford
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not press his claim, leading the judge to conclude it was in the interests of justice to dismiss under rule 47.
The Tribunal found no evidence that the decision‑maker knew the claimant’s race or that race influenced the back‑pay decision, so direct race discrimination was not established.
Heard at London South
The tribunal found the claim of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well‑founded and dismissed it.
Heard at Reading
The Tribunal found that London Underground had not demonstrated a fair reason or a proportionate procedure for dismissing Albu, and therefore his claim of unfair dismissal succeeded.
Heard at London South
All of the claimant’s discrimination and harassment claims were dismissed as not well‑founded.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.