Jurisdictional strike out
Employer: John Lewis plc
The claim was struck out because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to decide any of the legal complaints.
Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London South.
£631.20 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: John Lewis plc
The claim was struck out because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to decide any of the legal complaints.
Employer: Foresight Group LLP and Others
The claimant's application for interim relief failed because she did not demonstrate a pretty good chance of success on her whistleblowing claim, as the alleged disclosures lacked sufficient factual content and specificity.
Employer: Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust
The claim was dismissed because it was out of time, meaning the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear it.
Employer: Abbey DLD Colleges Ltd
The claims were validly settled under a settlement agreement, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear them and they were dismissed.
Employer: Secretary of State for Business and Trade and Bishop Challoner School (in voluntary liquidation)
The claimants won on protective award, some unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and wrongful dismissal claims, but lost on reasonable adjustments claim and some claims were withdrawn, resulting in a split outcome.
Employer: Ospinamaine Ltd
The claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract regarding bonus pay was dismissed as not well-founded.
Employer: Sky UK Ltd
The complaints of direct race discrimination were not well-founded and were dismissed.
Employer: Mansfield Sports Group Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)
The tribunal dismissed the claims because they were brought outside the statutory time limits and it was not reasonably practicable to bring them within a reasonable period thereafter.
Employer: FD Copeland & Sons Ltd
The claimant's claim for unfair dismissal succeeded, but his claims for breach of contract (bonus), whistleblowing detriment/automatic unfair dismissal, and all discrimination claims were dismissed.
Employer: National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux
All complaints were not well-founded and were dismissed by the tribunal.
Employer: Nando’s Chickenland Ltd
The claim was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success in respect of extending the time limit to present the claim.
Employer: WH Smith Travel Ltd
The claim was dismissed on 19 March 2026 for the claimant's failure to attend the final hearing, and the subsequent costs order is not a substantive verdict on the claim.
Employer: Pimlico Plumbers
The claimant's claims were struck out in their entirety because he failed to comply with Tribunal disclosure orders, acted unreasonably, and frustrated a fair trial by attending from a jurisdiction where he could not give evidence.
Employer: Hidden Hearing Ltd and Demant A/S
The tribunal found that the claimant resigned/retired from employment with the first respondent on 15 March 2024 and thereafter worked as an independent contractor, so there was no dismissal, and the tribunal lacked jurisdiction over the second respondent due to no ACAS Early Conciliation certificate.
Employer: The Secretary of State for Business and Trade and Dutemann UK Ltd
The claimants' complaints against the first respondent were not well-founded and were dismissed.
Employer: Decision Focus UK Ltd
The Tribunal dismissed all disability discrimination claims because the claimant did not have a disability as defined by section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.
Employer: S Dibben and others
The claimant succeeded only on the claim of direct race and sex discrimination and harassment regarding the Dual Diagnosis lead role; all other claims (including constructive unfair dismissal) were dismissed, and a remedy hearing is pending.
Employer: Teledyne FLIR
The Tribunal found that the Claimant was not dismissed but had voluntarily resigned, and that none of the alleged discriminatory acts or failures occurred, or if they did, they were not because of her disability.
Employer: Open Banking Ltd
The Tribunal only resolved a preliminary issue by finding the claimant disabled; no substantive claim was adjudicated.
Employer: Consigned Sealed Delivered Ltd and Mr G Marwan
The claims of unfair dismissal, automatic unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, unauthorised deductions, and breach of contract/service agreement were struck out as scandalous because they relied upon an illegal arrangement to defraud HMRC, making the contract tainted by illegality.
Employer: Secretary of State for Justice
The complaints of direct race discrimination and harassment related to race were not well-founded and were dismissed.
Employer: Lambeth Elfrida Rathbone Society
The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken at the end of employment.
Employer: Manger Moi Ltd
The claimant succeeded on claims for unauthorised deductions and failure to provide written particulars, but the indirect sex discrimination claim was dismissed.
Employer: Ramsgate Care Ltd
This is an interim relief judgment, not a final determination of the substantive claim; the claimant's application succeeded, but the substantive claim has not yet been decided, so this is classified as 'other'.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.