Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London South.
£77,162.49 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Lantain Ltd and A G Sandry
The claimant failed to demonstrate that it was likely (i.e., a pretty good chance) that the reason for dismissal was a protected disclosure; the evidence was insufficient to meet the high threshold for interim relief.
Employer: Lantain Ltd and A G Sandry
The claimant failed to demonstrate that his claim for automatic unfair dismissal due to protected disclosures had a 'pretty good chance of success' or was 'nearer to certainty than mere probability' at the interim relief stage.
Employer: Mad Lab Fitness Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)
The Employment Tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent.
Employer: Portofino London Ltd
The respondent failed to present a response, so the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded and succeeded.
Employer: Orion Education (formerly Eden Park High School)
All complaints were dismissed as not well-founded.
Employer: Brickowner Ltd
The Tribunal found that the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and was obliged to pay a redundancy payment, resulting in a total award of £14,203.83.
Employer: NHS England
The judgment text is incomplete, ending mid-sentence in the 'Issues' section, so no substantive verdict or award can be determined.
Employer: The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis
The tribunal granted the claimant's application to amend in part (disability status agreed) but refused the five disputed amendments, finding they were out of time, poorly particularised, and would cause prejudice to the respondent.
Employer: Home Office
The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed as not well-founded.
Employer: Harrods Ltd
The claims for unfair dismissal and failure to make reasonable adjustments were struck out because the claimant had no reasonable prospects of obtaining an extension of time, while the discrimination arising from disability claim survives.
Employer: Collection Pot Ltd
The tribunal found that the claimant's protected disclosures were not the principal reason for dismissal; genuine concerns about the claimant's work and conduct were the effective cause.
Employer: T B Whyte
The claimant's application for interim relief failed because she did not satisfy the high threshold of showing it was 'likely' that the Tribunal would find the reason for her dismissal was her protected disclosures, given the respondent's credible alternative explanation.
Employer: Cleanco Cleaning Services Ltd
The claimant was found to be an employee, so the claim will proceed to a full hearing.
Employer: Fresh Food Enterprises Ltd
The unfair dismissal and redundancy claims were dismissed for lack of qualifying service, but the claimants succeeded on claims for unpaid wages, commission, notice pay, and holiday pay.
Employer: Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust
The application for interim relief was refused because the claimant did not demonstrate a 'pretty good chance' of succeeding at the final hearing on her claim of automatic unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures.
Employer: G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Ltd
The claimant's discrimination claims were dismissed as they had no reasonable prospect of success, and the claimant was ordered to pay costs for unreasonably continuing after a costs warning.
Employer: Jusan Technologies Ltd and Mr M R Wahid
The claimant succeeded in his claim that he was subjected to detriment for making protected disclosures about financial misconduct.
Employer: Pries Appliances Ltd
The respondent unlawfully deducted wages and failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars, resulting in a total award of £3,287.50.
Employer: TJ Morris Ltd T/a Home Bargains
The claim of constructive unfair dismissal succeeded (with 15% contributory fault), but the wages claim was dismissed.
Employer: UK Power Networks (Operations) Ltd
The claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and breach of contract were dismissed as not well founded.
Employer: BAU Firms Ltd
The respondent made an unauthorised deduction of £300 from the claimant's wages.
Employer: St Andrews Centre
All claims were dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the hearing.
Employer: London Eco Solutions Ltd
The claim for wrongful termination of the apprenticeship contract was well founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay damages.
Employer: CD&R Galaxy UK OPCO Ltd (T/a Vialto Partners)
The Employment Judge refused the claimant's application for interim relief.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.