14 May 20266044070/2025
Unauthorised Deductions from Wages
Employer: D & D Leasing UK Ltd
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found to be well-founded by consent.
Claimant won£14,267.36 awarded
London South Employment Tribunal cases
Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London South.
- Recent cases
- 87
- Employers
- 24
- Recorded awards (last 3 months)
- 7
£221,286.74 combined
Published decisions
Cases from the last three months
Newest decisions first
13 May 20266002417/2026
Unauthorised Deductions from Wages and Holiday Pay
Employer: 68 Plus Ltd
The Tribunal found the claims for unauthorised deductions and holiday pay well-founded and that the Respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars.
Claimant won£6,599.62 awarded
13 May 20266003607/2025
Unfair Dismissal and Whistleblowing
Employer: Greene King Retail Services Ltd
The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing and had consistently failed to comply with the Tribunal's directions.
Claim struck out
13 May 20266040980/2025
Unfair Dismissal and Disability Discrimination
Employer: ABM Facility Services UK Ltd
The claim for unfair dismissal was struck out, while the complaints of disability discrimination were permitted to continue.
Mixed outcome
11 May 20266022112/2024
Employment Claim
Employer: Arriva Rail London Ltd
The claim was struck out due to the claimant's failure to comply with Tribunal Rules or orders and the resulting impossibility of a fair hearing.
Claim struck out
11 May 20266018999/2025
Unpaid Holiday Pay and Unlawful Deductions from Wages
Employer: David Lloyd Leisure Ltd
The Tribunal found that the complaints were brought within the prescribed time limits and therefore the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the claims.
Claimant won
10 May 20262306370/2025
Employment Status / Jurisdiction
Employer: Sustainable Agriculture Initiative (SAI) Platform
The Tribunal found the claimant was an independent contractor and not an employee or worker, meaning the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the claims.
Dismissed on jurisdiction
8 May 20262304223
Preliminary Hearing on Working Time Regulations
Employer: Prinova Solutions Europe Ltd
The Tribunal found that the overtime clause was discretionary and therefore did not fall within regulation 16(3ZA) of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
Claim dismissed
8 May 20266007982/2024
Automatic Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination
Employer: Ansa Care Ltd
The Tribunal found the claimant's complaints were not well-founded and dismissed all claims.
Claim dismissed
7 May 20262301901/2024
Employment Claim
Employer: Currys Group Ltd
The claims were struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success.
Claim struck out
7 May 20266043212/2025
Notice Pay
Employer: Royal British Legion
The Tribunal found that the claimant's claim for notice pay was not well-founded and therefore dismissed it.
Claim dismissed
7 May 20266046325/2025
Breach of Contract
Employer: Elivia Homes Ltd
The Tribunal found that the claimant's claim for breach of contract succeeded.
Claimant won£1,236.96 awarded
6 May 20262301900/2022
Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination
Employer: Biox Systems Ltd
The claimant succeeded on the majority of claims including unfair dismissal and discrimination, but the flexible working claim was dismissed for being out of time.
Mixed outcome
6 May 20262309481/2025
Employment Status (Redundancy Payment and Notice Pay)
Employer: Mr N Faulkner T/a The Drive Prep School
The Tribunal found that the reality of the working relationship, including personal service, control by the respondent, and mutuality of obligation, meant the claimant was an employee under s.230 ERA 1996.
Claimant won
6 May 20262300182/2026
Interim Relief Application
Employer: Thor Companies Ltd
The claimant's application for interim relief was dismissed because he failed to show a pretty good chance that his email was a qualifying disclosure under section 43B, as it related only to his own employment situation and did not raise any of the listed public interest matters.
Claim dismissed
4 May 20266013801/2024
Unauthorised deductions from wages
Employer: First Hydrogen Ltd and Others
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found to be well-founded by consent of the parties.
Claimant won£180,087.10 awarded
4 May 20266031266/2025
Unauthorised Deductions from Wages
Employer: Econowise Drives and Controls Ltd
The Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages to be well-founded.
Claimant won£3,750 awarded
30 Apr 20262304167/2025
Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination
Employer: Krinkles UK Ltd (Continental Landscapes)
The claims were presented out of time and the Tribunal found no reasonable practicability or just and equitable grounds to extend the limits.
Dismissed on jurisdiction
30 Apr 20262300026/2026
Unauthorised Deductions from Wages and Failure to Provide Written Statement
Employer: Support Services Leaders Ltd
The claimant's complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages and failure to provide a written statement were upheld.
Claimant won£3,076.47 awarded
29 Apr 20262302098/2024
Discrimination
Employer: London Borough of Southwark
The Tribunal found that the complaints of direct discrimination because of marriage and failure to make reasonable adjustments were not well-founded.
Claim dismissed
29 Apr 20262302139/2024
Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy Payment, Notice Pay, Holiday Pay, Statutory Sick Pay
Employer: Mr C Charalambous (as executor of Mr J Charalambous) and Ms J Crossfield
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim against respondent 1 was dismissed, but her unfair dismissal, redundancy payment, notice pay, holiday pay, and statutory sick pay claims against respondent 2 succeeded.
Mixed outcome
28 Apr 20262309730/2025
Unauthorised Deductions from Wages
Employer: Saint Noir Ltd
The Tribunal found the complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages to be well-founded for all three claimants.
Claimant won£12,269.23 awarded
28 Apr 20266035147/2025
Unauthorised deduction of wages
Employer: AHK Security Solutions
The claim succeeded because the respondent failed to respond to the claim, leading to a default judgment under Rule 22.
Claimant won
27 Apr 20262302917/2022
Pregnancy and Maternity Discrimination and Victimisation
Employer: Novadiscovery SA
The Respondent's response was struck out for failure to actively pursue the case, leading the Tribunal to find the claims of discrimination and victimisation well-founded.
Claimant won
Pro case research
Need more cases or more precise results?
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.