Strike-out Application / Preliminary Hearing
Employer: Zotefoams plc
The Tribunal rejected the strike-out applications from both parties and declined to award a deposit, meaning the case will proceed.
Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at London South.
£31,175.03 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Zotefoams plc
The Tribunal rejected the strike-out applications from both parties and declined to award a deposit, meaning the case will proceed.
Employer: Besamalsore UK Ltd T/a Topolino
The Respondent failed to provide evidence of payment or a valid counter-position, and the Tribunal accepted the Claimant's evidence regarding his tenure and pay.
Employer: Surrey Partnership Care Ltd and Ms D E Mutsi
The claims against the first respondent and the discrimination claim against the second respondent were permitted to proceed, but wage-related claims against the second respondent were dismissed.
Employer: Bylor Services Ltd
The claim was dismissed because it was submitted out of time and the claimant failed to prove that it was not reasonably practicable to have filed it within the limit.
Employer: Black Pearl Offshore Ltd
The Tribunal found the claim for direct age discrimination to be well-founded and determined the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment.
Employer: Suez Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd
The age discrimination claim was withdrawn and the tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded.
Employer: Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
The Respondent admitted to making unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages in breach of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Employer: The Chief Constable of Sussex
The previous judgment was revoked in the interest of justice, and the case has been remitted to hear a jurisdiction issue.
Employer: Beck Interiors Ltd (in Adminstration)
The Tribunal found the claims well-founded as the Respondent failed to comply with statutory collective consultation requirements.
Employer: Nevill Golf Club
The respondent conceded the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages in the sum of £84.00.
Employer: Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
The claimant succeeded in her claim for unfair dismissal and a specific unlawful deduction regarding notice pay, but failed or was out of jurisdiction for all discrimination and other wage claims.
Employer: Anthem Schools Trust and Ms S Bhadare
The Tribunal found no evidence that the respondents knew of the claimant's disability or that the recruitment decisions were based on anything other than candidate performance and budgetary constraints.
Employer: PMD Consulting (UK) LLP
The complaint of unlawful deduction of wages was well-founded because the respondent underpaid the claimant for the period in question, and the compensation awarded represents the net financial loss suffered.
Employer: Beauty Science UK
The claim for the non-payment of the bonus was presented out of time, meaning the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear it.
Employer: The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
The claim for disability-related harassment was withdrawn, and the remaining complaints regarding reasonable adjustments, unfavourable treatment, and indirect discrimination were found not to be well-founded.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.