Primark Stores Ltd employment tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Primark Stores Ltd.

Cases (last 2 years)
5
Tribunal locations (last 2 years)
2
Recorded awards (last 2 years)
1

£31.62 combined

Published decisions

Five most recent decisions

Newest decisions first

31 Jul 2026
Mixed outcome£31.62 awarded

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination, Unpaid Wages, Breach of Contract and Other

Heard at Leeds

The discrimination, unfair dismissal, failure to comply with flexible working request, and breach of contract claims were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success, but the claimant succeeded on her unlawful deduction of wages claim for one day's pay.

Legal Issues (8)
  • Strike out for no reasonable prospect of success
  • insufficient service for unfair dismissal
  • failure to plead causation in discrimination
  • amendment application refused due to delay
  • lack of draft pleading
  • no reasonable justification
  • time limits for discrimination and unfair dismissal
  • consent judgment on unpaid wages

Reference: 1800962/2026

29 May 2026
Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

The claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and direct race/religion discrimination were not well founded and were dismissed.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Unfair dismissal
  • direct race discrimination
  • direct religion discrimination
  • failure to pursue other discrimination claims

Reference: 6012811/2025

1 May 2026
Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Harassment

All claims were dismissed because the tribunal found no merit in any of the allegations of unfair dismissal, discrimination, or harassment.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Breach of s94 Employment Rights Act 1996 (unfair dismissal)
  • s13 Equality Act 2010 (race, religion/belief, sex discrimination)
  • s26 Equality Act 2010 (age harassment)

Reference: 6007985/2024

2 Oct 2025
Claim struck out

Discrimination

The claim was struck out because the claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of s 6 Equality Act 2010, as his wrist impairment did not have a substantial, adverse, long‑term effect on normal daily activities.

Legal Issues (2)
  • Whether the claimant’s wrist condition satisfied the definition of a disability under s 6 Equality Act 2010 (i.e., a physical impairment that has a substantial, adverse and long‑term effect on normal day‑to‑day activities)
  • the procedural consequence of the claimant’s non‑compliance with case‑management orders

Reference: 3302737/2024

6 May 2025
Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal

Heard at London East

The claim was struck out because the Tribunal concluded it had no reasonable prospect of success and the claimant’s earlier withdrawal was legally effective.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Whether the unfair dismissal claim had a reasonable prospect of success
  • the legal effect of a claimant’s withdrawal of a claim under the Tribunal Rules 2024
  • the availability of a rehearing or reconsideration of a struck‑out judgment
  • application of the rules on finality of withdrawals despite the claimant’s disability status

Reference: 6021748/2024

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.

Primark Stores Ltd Employment Tribunal Cases – 5 Latest Decisions | WorkDisputes