Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Bristol.
£126,065.51 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Entangled Positions Ltd
The claimant's claims were upheld because the respondent failed to attend or properly defend the claims, and the undisputed evidence showed a fundamental breach of contract by non-payment of wages.
Employer: Lidl Great Britain Ltd
The tribunal found that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were not well founded and dismissed them.
Employer: Secretary of State for Justice
The claimant's complaints of harassment and health and safety detriment were withdrawn, and the direct sex discrimination claim was dismissed as not well founded.
Employer: Jamkam Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)
The claimant succeeded on constructive unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions, and breach of contract, but the holiday pay claim was dismissed, resulting in a split verdict.
The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because the claimant did not have the required two years' qualifying service for an ordinary unfair constructive dismissal claim.
Employer: John Lewis plc
All claims were found not well founded and were dismissed.
Employer: National Tennis Association CIC
The tribunal implied a contractual term that the claimant was entitled to be paid for additional hours worked outside her core duties, and accepted Mr Paxton's evidence that 38 hours were owed.
Employer: Snows Motor Group Ltd
The claimant succeeded because the employer's dismissal was procedurally unfair and wrongful, as it failed to properly investigate the customer's abusive behaviour and relied on insufficient evidence, with the tribunal finding contributory fault of 15%.
Employer: Sterling Facilities Management (UK) Ltd
All claims were dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant resigned and his complaints of unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and unlawful deduction were not well-founded.
Employer: The Secretary of State
The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with tribunal directions (no witness statement, non-attendance) and a further hearing was disproportionate given the claim's low value and poor prospects of success on employment status.
Employer: Computershare Investor Services plc
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out due to insufficient service, and the discrimination claim was dismissed as out of time with no grounds for a just and equitable extension.
Employer: Principles Recruitment Care Agency Ltd
The claims were found to be well-founded after the Respondent failed to submit a timely response to the proceedings.
Employer: Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages due to erroneous grade changes and pay rate adjustments, and the claim was well-founded.
Employer: The Red Brick Building Centre Ltd
The claimant succeeded in his claims for unfair dismissal and breach of contract, resulting in a total award of £38,527.17.
Employer: Bosun Care Ltd
All complaints were dismissed by the Tribunal, with the wage claims withdrawn and the remaining claims found not well-founded.
The claims for unfair and wrongful dismissal were upheld against the first respondent, but the claim for redundancy pay was dismissed.
Employer: Carnival plc
The unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn by the claimant and the discrimination claims were dismissed due to a lack of tribunal jurisdiction under Section 123 of the Equality Act 2010.
Employer: Nice Systems UK Ltd
The claimant was unfairly dismissed due to a flawed redundancy process, although the award was reduced by 35% for contributory fault.
Employer: Alfa Tail Lifts Ltd
The claims were struck out because the claimant failed to comply with case management orders, failed to actively pursue the claims, and did not attend the scheduled hearing.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.