Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Bristol.
£216,592.86 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Secretary of State for Justice
The Claimant failed to prove that her impairments of ILO, DBPD, asthma, and GORD had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities.
Reference: 6029870/2025
Employer: Your Path Ltd and Others
The claimant won on constructive unfair dismissal and unlawful deductions from wages but lost on direct and indirect discrimination claims.
Reference: 6008285/2024
Employer: The Chief Constable Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary
The claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that she had dyslexia amounting to a mental impairment, or that any such impairment had a substantial adverse effect on her day-to-day activities during the relevant period.
Reference: 6020496/2025
Employer: Greenfields Financial Management Ltd
The claimant's claims were dismissed because the tribunal found his evidence unreliable and dishonest, and concluded that the respondent did not breach the implied term of trust and confidence or commit any repudiatory breach of contract.
Reference: 1402038/2025
Employer: Activ8 For Kids Ltd
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of qualifying service, and the remaining claims were dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the hearing.
Reference: 1402267/2025
Employer: Horizon Leisure Trust
The claim was dismissed because it was submitted out of time and it was reasonably practicable for it to have been submitted within the time limit, so the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.
Reference: 6043377/2025
Employer: Altrad Employment Services Ltd
The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend the final hearing without good reason after disengaging from the proceedings.
Reference: 6026939/2025
Employer: C De Souza
Claim struck out due to Claimant's persistent failure to comply with multiple Tribunal orders and failure to attend the hearing.
Reference: 1400369/2025
Employer: FP Hurley and Sons Ltd
Unfair dismissal claim succeeded due to failure to consider suitable alternative employment, but wrongful dismissal and written particulars claims failed.
Reference: 6012243/2025
Employer: Andros UK Ltd
The claimant succeeded on one harassment claim (racially offensive comment) but failed on all other claims including whistleblowing, discrimination, constructive dismissal, and breach of contract.
Reference: 6002021/2024
Employer: Defence Equipment and Support
Most claims struck out for unreasonable conduct and non-compliance; automatic unfair dismissal claim allowed to proceed.
Reference: 6023572/2024
Employer: Virtuoso Doors Ltd (in administration)
The respondent failed to consult with employee representatives about the proposed mass redundancies, as required by s.188 TULRCA, and no special circumstances excused the failure, so the protective award claim succeeded.
Reference: 1400950/2025
Employer: Poole Property Holdings Ltd (In Administration)
The respondent's response was struck out for non-compliance with disclosure orders and failure to pursue the case, and the claimant's claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay were found well-founded.
Reference: 6038061/2025
Employer: G3 Systems
The complaint of holiday pay was not well-founded because the respondent did not make an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's final salary payment.
Reference: 1402079/2025
Employer: Linx Christian Youth Trust
The respondent failed to file a response and did not attend the hearing, so judgment was entered for the claimant by default.
Reference: 6036694/2025
Employer: Veolia Es (UK) Ltd
The tribunal found that the employer acted reasonably in dismissing the claimant for capability (ill-health) after meaningful consultation, obtaining medical advice, and offering a return-to-work plan, and the claimant was unable to return due to unresolved workplace stressors.
Reference: 6038291/2025
Employer: L Broad
The claimant succeeded in her claim for unauthorised deductions from wages, but her unfair dismissal claim was struck out due to insufficient service.
Reference: 6030549/2025
Employer: Winnens 1929 Ltd
The claimant's claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and holiday pay were well founded and succeeded because the respondent failed to attend or defend the claims and the evidence supported the claimant's case.
Reference: 1402227/2025
Employer: Fairbanks Traditional Fish & Chips Ltd
The respondent failed to submit a response, leading to a default judgment under Rule 22 that all claims succeeded.
Reference: 6030811/2025
Employer: Gareth Webb & Co LLP
Respondent failed to present a valid response; default judgment entered in favour of all claimants.
Reference: 1403057/2025
Employer: Swindon Borough Council
The claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal failed because the alleged breaches, even where admitted, did not objectively amount to a fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, and the claimant had not resigned in response to any such breach.
Reference: 6024780/2025
Employer: Stockbrook Capital Ltd
The claimant succeeded on two claims of unauthorised deductions and one breach of contract claim, but other deduction claims were dismissed.
Reference: 6021439/2025
Employer: Entangled Positions Ltd
The claimant's claims were upheld because the respondent failed to attend or properly defend the claims, and the undisputed evidence showed a fundamental breach of contract by non-payment of wages.
Reference: 6024726/2025
Employer: Historic England
All claims were either withdrawn or dismissed because the Tribunal found the dismissal was fair, the discrimination claims were not well-founded, and the Claimant's own culpable conduct caused the breakdown of working relationships.
Reference: 6002213/2024
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.