Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Glasgow.
£23,108.82 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Estar Restaurants Group Ltd (T/a McDonald’s)
The tribunal upheld the claimant's unfair dismissal claim, applied a 20% contributory fault reduction, declined a Polkey reduction, and adjourned remedy because the respondent did not consent to judgment on the agreed sums.
Reference: 4100993/2026
Employer: UK Border Force
The Tribunal found the dismissal was fair because the respondent had a reasonable belief in the misconduct, conducted a reasonable investigation, and the decision to dismiss was within the range of reasonable responses.
Reference: 8000298/2026
Employer: University of Strathclyde
The Employment Tribunal dismissed the claim because it had no jurisdiction, as the claim falls under Part 6 (Education) of the Equality Act 2010 and must be brought in the Sheriff Court.
Reference: 8000711/2025
Employer: Mr G Murray (T/a Stonehouse Service Station)
The claimant succeeded on her harassment claim and received compensation for injury to feelings, but her other claims were dismissed or withdrawn.
Reference: 8001491/2025
Employer: MKA Commercial Ltd
The claimant failed to prove on balance of probabilities that her anxiety and depression had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on daily activities, separate from her chronic back pain.
Reference: 4100103/2026
Employer: Student Loans Company Ltd
All active Equality Act claims failed because the claimant was not placed at a substantial disadvantage by the absence-reporting PCP, the call did not amount to harassment, and the record of discussion was not unfavourable, not disability-related and was justified.
Reference: 8002436/2025
Employer: Lidl Great Britain Ltd
The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because the complaint was presented substantially out of time and it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented it by June 2024, so no extension was justified.
Reference: 8000510/2026
Employer: Lidl Great Britain Ltd
The disability discrimination claim was dismissed because it was presented more than three months after the last act of alleged discrimination and it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit.
Reference: 8001636/2025
Employer: Haldane Construction Services Ltd
The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded agreed compensation.
Reference: 8000293/2026
Employer: Incovo Ltd and others
The claimant succeeded in her ordinary unfair dismissal claim because the respondent failed to follow a fair redundancy process, but her other claims of automatic unfair dismissal, detriment, and discrimination were dismissed.
Reference: 4102751/2024
Employer: Glasgow City Council
The tribunal dismissed all claims because the dismissal was fair (within the range of reasonable responses) and there was no evidence that the claimant's disability, race, or protected acts influenced the decision to dismiss or any other treatment.
Reference: 8000208/2025
Employer: SCCL Operations Ltd
All claims were dismissed because the claimant failed to actively pursue her claims, did not attend the preliminary hearing, and did not provide updated contact details.
Reference: 4100464/2026
Employer: Lerue Healthcare Ltd
The claimant lost her unfair dismissal claim because the tribunal found the dismissal was due to conduct and performance concerns, not her wage complaint, but she won her wages claim by consent.
Reference: 8000342/2026
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.