Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd employment tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd.

Cases (last 2 years)
20
Tribunal locations (last 2 years)
10
Recorded awards (last 2 years)
2

£1,828.46 combined

Published decisions

Five most recent decisions

Newest decisions first

27 Jul 2026
Claim dismissed

Discrimination

Heard at Manchester

The tribunal dismissed all disability discrimination claims because the evidence did not establish that the claimant was placed at a substantial disadvantage by any PCP, nor that the treatment complained of was unfavourable because of something arising in consequence of her disability.

Legal Issues (1)
  • Disability discrimination: failure to make reasonable adjustments under s.20-21 EqA 2010 and discrimination arising from disability under s.15 EqA 2010. The tribunal considered whether the respondent applied a PCP causing substantial disadvantage and whether the treatment was 'something arising in consequence of disability' and if it was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim

Reference: 6005622/2024

5 May 2026
Claim dismissed

Discrimination

Heard at Midlands West

The tribunal concluded that the respondent did not fail to make reasonable adjustments because the claimant's request to work from home was not reasonable given the operational needs of the role, particularly the requirement for in-person attendance to perform health and safety assessments, supervise technicians, and conduct performance management meetings.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Whether the respondent contravened section 39 of the Equality Act 2010 by failing to make reasonable adjustments
  • whether the claimant's disability (type 2 diabetes and hypertension) was known
  • whether the provision
  • criterion or practice (requiring attendance at Crewe) placed the claimant at a substantial disadvantage
  • whether allowing home working was a reasonable adjustment

Reference: 1306027/2024

1 May 2026
Claimant won£1,576.31 awarded

Unpaid Wages

Heard at Bristol

The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages due to erroneous grade changes and pay rate adjustments, and the claim was well-founded.

Legal Issues (2)
  • Whether the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant’s entitlement to a pay increase under her contract was established
  • the deductions were not justified

Reference: 6029371/2025

27 Apr 2026
Claim struck out

Other

The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to actively pursue the proceedings or respond to the Tribunal's warning letter.

Legal Issues (1)
  • Failure to actively pursue a claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024

Reference: 6010207/2025

26 Mar 2026
Claim dismissed

Discrimination and Whistleblowing

The claim was dismissed because the claimant falsely claimed an early‑conciliation exemption that did not apply, breaching Rule 13(2).

Legal Issues (3)
  • Whether the claim form satisfied the early‑conciliation requirements under Rules 12 and 13 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
  • applicability of the early‑conciliation exemption in Regulation 3(1)(c)
  • procedural compliance versus substantive discrimination allegations

Reference: 2300470/2026

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.