Reconsideration Application
The application for reconsideration was refused because the claimant failed to identify the protected act and detriment relied upon.
Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Royal Mail Group Ltd.
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
The application for reconsideration was refused because the claimant failed to identify the protected act and detriment relied upon.
Heard at Leeds
The claim was dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing and provided no explanation for his absence.
Heard at Newcastle
The substantive detriment claims were found not to be well-founded, and the remaining detriment and discrimination claims were struck out for being out of time.
Heard at Watford
The Tribunal found that the transfer to the Regional Redeployment Programme was not unfavourable; moreover, any alleged unfavourable treatment was due to the claimant's financial and childcare circumstances, not something arising from her disability.
Heard at Southampton
The Tribunal found that all of the claimant's complaints for discrimination and victimisation failed and were therefore dismissed.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.