Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Newcastle.
£78,526.08 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Borthwick Group Ltd
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was well-founded and the Tribunal awarded compensation.
Reference: 2501443/2025
Employer: Wisteria Kitchen Restaurants Ltd
All claims were struck out because the claimant failed to attend the hearing and failed to comply with an order for further information.
Reference: 6042660/2025
Employer: A Mohan Ltd T/a Clearview Commercial Window Cleaning Services
The breach of contract claim was won with damages awarded, but the unfair dismissal claim was only determined on liability with remedy outstanding, resulting in a split outcome where one claim is fully resolved and the other remains pending.
Reference: 6035202/2025
Employer: Ineos Compounds Aycliffe Ltd
The Tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims in their entirety.
Reference: 6035896/2025
Employer: North Yorkshire Council
The tribunal found that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and dismissed the complaint after a full merits hearing.
Reference: 2501387/2025
Employer: Unisus Group Ltd
All three complaints were found well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay a total of £4544.37.
Reference: 6015508/2026
Employer: Care Quality Commission
The claimant's unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and most discrimination claims were dismissed, while two discrimination sub-claims were allowed to proceed on time limit grounds, resulting in a split outcome.
Reference: 6010998/2024
Employer: Aspen Wolf Ltd
Both claims were dismissed (one upon withdrawal, the other on its merits), resulting in no success for the claimant.
Reference: 6016505/2026
Employer: N Storey
The tribunal found the claimant was a worker and awarded unpaid wages, resulting in a win for the claimant.
Reference: 6042712/2025
Employer: Blossom Homecare Ltd
All claims were dismissed: unfair dismissal withdrawn, and the remaining Equality Act claims were dismissed as out of time as it was not just and equitable to extend time.
Reference: 6017618/2025
Employer: Reprotec Group Ltd
The Tribunal found the claim of unfair constructive dismissal not well founded and dismissed it.
Reference: 6040500/2025
Employer: Humbledon and Plains Farm Workmen’s Club and Institute Ltd
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed as out of time, but the statutory redundancy claim succeeded and the claimant was awarded £2,564.10.
Reference: 2501478/2025
Employer: David Lloyd Leisure Ltd
The claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not engage with the tribunal, leading to dismissal of all claims under Rule 47.
Reference: 6012731/2025
Employer: Department for Work and Pensions
The claimant failed to attend the preliminary hearing and provided no explanation or engagement, leading to dismissal of all claims.
Reference: 6037529/2025
Employer: Agelec Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) and Electrogenius Ltd
The tribunal found that the first claimant's notice pay and redundancy claims were not well-founded, but upheld the first claimant's annual leave claim and the second claimant's notice pay and redundancy claims, awarding damages and a redundancy payment.
Reference: 2500601/2025
Employer: G4S Facilities Management (UK) Ltd
The complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded.
Reference: 6029011/2025
Employer: Effective Security Services Ltd T/a Professional Security
The claimant won on unlawful deductions because rolled-up holiday pay was calculated on a below-minimum-wage basic rate, but lost all other claims because the cessation of shifts was due to an automatic right-to-work suspension, not a reaction to his complaints or disclosures.
Reference: 6019957/2024
Employer: Ground Control Ltd
The claim of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Reference: 6027678/2025
Employer: Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
The claimant's claims for breach of contract, unfair dismissal, and unauthorised deductions were all upheld, with compensation awarded for each.
Reference: 2501339/2024
Employer: Costain Ltd
All claims were either dismissed as not well founded or withdrawn by the claimant.
Reference: 2500538/2025
Employer: HSBC UK Bank plc
The claimant succeeded on one discrimination claim (failure to provide a printer) but failed on other discrimination and victimisation claims, and other claims were struck out.
Reference: 2500230/2025
Employer: Carsa Ltd
The claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Reference: 6037395/2025
Employer: WORR Ltd
The claimant failed to prove any of his complaints (unfair dismissal, failure to make adjustments, discrimination arising from disability) were well-founded.
Reference: 2500539/2025
Employer: The Commissioners For HM’s Revenue and Customs
The claims of disability discrimination were not well-founded and were dismissed.
Reference: 6004215/2025
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.