Unauthorised deductions from wages and holiday pay
Employer: Ms J Paterson (T/a Jacqui Paterson’s Veterinary Practice)
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and failed to pay accrued holiday pay.
Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Newcastle.
£59,963.50 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: Ms J Paterson (T/a Jacqui Paterson’s Veterinary Practice)
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and failed to pay accrued holiday pay.
Employer: National Care Network Ltd
The claimant succeeded on all four complaints: breach of contract for notice pay and holiday pay, redundancy payment, and unauthorised deductions from wages.
Employer: National Care Network Franchising Ltd
All complaints were well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant for notice pay, holiday pay, redundancy payment, and unauthorised deductions.
Employer: Angela’s Law Ltd
The claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, unpaid holiday pay, and breach of contract were all well-founded.
Employer: Northumberland County Council
The claim was dismissed because it was not presented within the time limit, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
Employer: Halo Hair Group
The claimant did not have the required two years of continuous service to bring an unfair dismissal claim, and the claim was struck out; later dismissed for non-attendance.
Employer: Fishers Services Ltd
The tribunal found no evidence that any of the alleged treatments were because of or related to the claimant's Polish nationality; all complaints were either struck out for lack of jurisdiction or dismissed as not well-founded.
Employer: Superdrug Stores plc
The claimant succeeded on the unauthorised deduction from wages claim (£201.60) but failed on all discrimination claims, which were dismissed.
Employer: Jensen’s Cooperage Ltd
The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued by the claimant.
Employer: Jensen’s Cooperage Ltd
The claim was struck out because the claimant had not actively pursued it.
Employer: Jensen’s Cooperage Ltd
The claim was struck out because it was not actively pursued by the claimant.
Employer: Sporting Chance NE Ltd
The claimant succeeded on all claims because the respondent unfairly dismissed him for making protected disclosures, wrongfully dismissed him, made unlawful deductions, and owed holiday pay.
Employer: ASEL Temporary Security Solutions Ltd
All complaints were dismissed because the claimant failed to establish any less favourable treatment due to race, any protected act leading to detriment, and his contract was a zero-hours contract with no guaranteed minimum hours or entitlement to the claimed holiday pay or deductions.
Employer: SNE Care Services Ltd
All claims were dismissed or struck out: unfair dismissal failed due to lack of qualifying service, and wrongful dismissal and race discrimination were brought out of time with no extension granted.
Employer: Learning Matters Trust Ltd and ARAG Legal Expenses Company Ltd
The claim was dismissed by consent after the parties reached a binding settlement agreement.
Employer: Department for Work and Pensions
The unfair dismissal claims were not well founded, and the tribunal lacked jurisdiction over the Equality Act claims, which were struck out.
Employer: The Happy Swim Company LLP
The claims for automatic unfair dismissal (constructive), breach of contract (notice pay), unauthorised deductions (training/mentoring), and victimisation were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success; a deposit of £25 was ordered for the direct race discrimination claim.
Employer: Middlesbrough DP Ltd
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim succeeded because the respondent failed to demonstrate a fair reason for dismissal or adhere to a fair procedure.
Employer: A Malik
The claimant was unfairly dismissed and not paid notice pay, and the respondent failed to present a response.
Employer: AG Coffee Shop Ltd
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and failed to pay accrued holiday pay, so both complaints were well-founded.
Employer: AG Coffee Shop Ltd
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded as the employer made an unauthorised deduction, but the holiday pay complaint was dismissed on withdrawal.
Employer: AG Coffee Shop Ltd
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and failed to pay holiday pay owed on termination.
Employer: AG Coffee Shop Ltd
The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and failed to pay holiday pay due on termination.
Employer: Utilita Field Services Ltd
The Tribunal found that the claim of automatically unfair dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.