Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions heard at Watford.
£323,858.14 combined
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Employer: The Brothers Supper Ltd and S Clarke and A Clarke T/a The Shoulder of Mutton
All claims were dismissed because the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction as the claimant was not an employee or worker.
Reference: 6015981/2025
Employer: AMC Installations Ltd
The tribunal found that the dismissal was for a fair reason (redundancy) and that the process, although short, was within the range of reasonable responses given the small size of the employer and the pool of one.
Reference: 3300859/2025
Employer: Dorchester Heating Solutions Ltd
The claim was struck out because the claimant did not have at least two years' continuous service, which is a jurisdictional requirement for bringing an unfair dismissal claim.
Reference: 3303531/2025
Employer: E H E Alrefai
The first and second claimants won their wage and written statement claims, but the third claimant lost his wage claim and the first claimant's whistleblowing and unfair dismissal claims were withdrawn.
Reference: 3302655/2025
Employer: Moneytrans UK Ltd and C.-H. Springuel
Claimant succeeded against first respondent for unpaid wages, redundancy, and holiday pay; claim against second respondent dismissed as not employer.
Reference: 3304517/2025
Employer: Mars Petcare UK
The claimant did not have the required two years' continuous service to bring an unfair dismissal claim, so the complaint was struck out and the entire claim dismissed.
Reference: 6019837/2024
Employer: Speak Like A Native Ltd and Monkfrith Primary School
The claimant won the unfair dismissal claim against the 1st respondent, but the same claim against the 2nd respondent was struck out, resulting in a split outcome.
Reference: 3305030/2024
Employer: BUPA Occupational Health Ltd
The claimant was not an employee, so unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; however, she was a worker, so the holiday pay claim will proceed.
Reference: 6022446/2024
Employer: British Airways plc
The claims of unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, and whistleblowing were dismissed for want of jurisdiction as they were presented out of time and the claimant failed to establish valid presentation or grounds for an extension.
Reference: 3311709/2024
Employer: Arrow Enterprise Computing Solutions Ltd
The claimant withdrew his whistleblowing claims and the tribunal refused his applications to amend his claims.
Reference: 6006052/2024
Employer: B&M Retail Ltd
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and no exception applied; the remaining claim for breach of non-contractual procedures was struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success; wage claims were withdrawn.
Reference: 3302815/2024
Employer: Tesco Stores Ltd
The specific complaint alleging that 'lack of promotion' was race discrimination was struck out, while the other complaints were allowed to proceed.
Reference: 6014525/2024
Employer: Independiente Communications Ltd
The claim was struck out because the claimant's employment was based in Hungary with insufficient connections to Great Britain, so the tribunal had no territorial jurisdiction under the ERA.
Reference: 3306100/2024
Employer: Hasbro European Services and D Farrow
The claim was dismissed because the claimant did not have the required two years of continuous service to bring an unfair dismissal claim.
Reference: 3300459/2026
Employer: Global Banking School Ltd and Global Edu Services Ltd
The claimant's claims are partially withdrawn and partially pending; no final liability determination has been made on the remaining discrimination claims.
Reference: 3311584/2023
Employer: Samworth Brothers Ltd
The Employment Tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded, ruling that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent.
Reference: 6013728/2024
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.