B&M Retail Ltd employment tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving B&M Retail Ltd.

Cases (last 2 years)
7
Tribunal locations (last 2 years)
4
Recorded awards (last 2 years)
0

Published decisions

Five most recent decisions

Newest decisions first

30 Jun 2026
Claim struck out

Unfair Dismissal, Unpaid Wages and Other

Heard at Watford

The unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and no exception applied; the remaining claim for breach of non-contractual procedures was struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success; wage claims were withdrawn.

Legal Issues (3)
  • Lack of two years' service for unfair dismissal
  • no reasonable prospect for non-contractual breach claim
  • withdrawal of wage claims

Reference: 3302815/2024

18 Mar 2026
Claim dismissed

Unpaid Wages and Breach of Contract

Heard at Manchester

The Tribunal found that the agreed salary at the interview was £32,000 and that the first contract sent was withdrawn before it was read or accepted.

Legal Issues (4)
  • Formation of contract
  • offer and acceptance
  • doctrine of unilateral mistake
  • whether the claimant affirmed the contract by remaining in employment

Reference: 6019246/2025

23 Jan 2026
Claimant won

Unfair Dismissal

The tribunal concluded that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim on time, so the claim was allowed to proceed.

Legal Issues (2)
  • Whether the claim was filed within the three‑month statutory limit or within a further period where it was not reasonably practicable to file earlier
  • applying s.111 and s.207B ERA and the reasonable‑practicability test

Reference: 8002178/2025

6 Oct 2025
Claimant won

Unfair Dismissal and Breach of Contract

Heard at Liverpool

The tribunal refused the respondent’s costs application because the claimant’s conduct did not meet the threshold of vexatious or unreasonable behaviour and the amendment claim, while unlikely to succeed, was not deemed to have no reasonable prospect, and the claimant’s limited means were taken into account.

Legal Issues (5)
  • Whether the respondent met the threshold under Employment Tribunal Rules 74(2)(a) and (b) to obtain a costs order – i.e
  • whether the claimant acted vexatiously or unreasonably and whether the amendment claim had no reasonable prospect of success – and
  • if so
  • whether the tribunal should exercise its discretion to award costs
  • taking into account the claimant’s ability to pay

Reference: 2409537/2023

25 Jun 2025
Claim struck out

Other

Heard at Newcastle

The claimant's claim was struck out because the claimant did not attend the hearing.

Legal Issues (2)
  • Strike out for non-attendance
  • no substantive issues addressed

Reference: 6002296/2025

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.