Unfair Dismissal
The claim was struck out because the claimant did not meet the statutory requirement of two years' continuous service.
Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Marks and Spencer plc.
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
The claim was struck out because the claimant did not meet the statutory requirement of two years' continuous service.
Heard at Liverpool
The claims for unfair dismissal and unauthorised wages were dismissed, but the claim for wrongful dismissal (notice pay) was upheld.
Heard at Exeter
The Tribunal concluded the claimant did not have a disability at the material time, so her disability discrimination claim was dismissed.
Heard at Liverpool
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to submit the ET1 within the statutory time limit, rendering the claim out of time.
Heard at London Central
All of the claimant’s claims were dismissed because she failed to prove discrimination, unfair dismissal or unpaid wages and several complaints were out of time, leaving the Tribunal without jurisdiction to hear them.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.