Sysco GB Ltd employment tribunal cases

Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Sysco GB Ltd.

Cases (last 2 years): 5
Tribunal locations (last 2 years): 4
Recorded awards (last 2 years): 0

Published decisions

Five most recent decisions

Newest decisions first

31 Jul 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal and Discrimination

Heard at Watford

Both claims dismissed: unfair dismissal out of time and claimant not disabled for discrimination claims.

Legal Issues (3)

Time limits for presenting unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims
definition of disability under section 6 Equality Act 2010
just and equitable extension for discrimination claims

Reference: 6018191/2025

30 Jan 2026

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal

Heard at Leeds

The Tribunal found the claimant’s evidence unreliable, accepted the respondent’s evidence of misconduct, and concluded the dismissal for gross misconduct was fair.

Legal Issues (4)

Whether the dismissal was for genuine misconduct
whether the employer acted reasonably and followed a fair procedure
compliance with the ACAS Code of Practice
the entitlement to any compensatory or basic award for unfair dismissal

Reference: 6029720/2025

20 Nov 2025

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal

Heard at Wales

The Tribunal concluded that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and dismissed the claim as not well‑founded.

Legal Issues (2)

Whether the dismissal satisfied the statutory test for fairness under the Employment Rights Act 1996
including the reasonableness of the employer’s decision and the adequacy of any procedural steps taken

Reference: 6003749/2025

24 Oct 2025

Dismissed on jurisdiction

Unfair Dismissal

Heard at London East

Dismissed because the claimant was five weeks short of the two‑year continuous service required to have jurisdiction for an ordinary unfair dismissal claim.

Legal Issues (3)

Whether the claimant satisfied the two‑year continuous service requirement under s108 ERA to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim
whether the claim could be treated as automatically unfair
the tribunal’s jurisdiction to hear the claim

Reference: 6020132/2025

22 Oct 2025

Claim dismissed

Unfair Dismissal, Discrimination and Whistleblowing

Heard at London East

The claim was filed out of time and it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have lodged it within the limitation period, so the unfair‑dismissal claim was dismissed and the amendment was refused.

Legal Issues (3)

Whether the unfair‑dismissal claim was filed within the statutory three‑month limitation period (subject to extension by an Acas certificate)
whether the claimant could rely on the later Acas certificate to reset the limitation date
whether the amendment to add new causes of action should be allowed under the Selkent/Vaughan test

Reference: 3200106/2025

Pro case research

Need more cases or more precise results?

Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.

Open Pro Case Search

Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.