Unfair dismissal
Heard at Leeds
The Tribunal found the claimant’s evidence unreliable, accepted the respondent’s evidence of misconduct, and concluded the dismissal for gross misconduct was fair.
Browse recent Employment Tribunal decisions involving Sysco GB Ltd.
Published decisions
Newest decisions first
Heard at Leeds
The Tribunal found the claimant’s evidence unreliable, accepted the respondent’s evidence of misconduct, and concluded the dismissal for gross misconduct was fair.
Heard at Wales
The Tribunal concluded that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and dismissed the claim as not well‑founded.
Heard at London East
Dismissed because the claimant was five weeks short of the two‑year continuous service required to have jurisdiction for an ordinary unfair dismissal claim.
Heard at London East
The claim was filed out of time and it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have lodged it within the limitation period, so the unfair‑dismissal claim was dismissed and the amendment was refused.
Search the full case database by keywords, case details, similar facts and compensation awarded.
Case details come from published tribunal decisions. Always check the official decision before relying on a result.